Archive for the ‘War on terror’ Category

The "War On Terror" Is A Fraud – It Is Not Meant To Be Won, It Is Meant To Be Continuous

November 6, 2010

http://revolutionarypolitics.tv/video/embedPlayer.php?vid=15bc628d47f736bedf12b75d7_12368

Decoding the T-Party (Talmud Party)

October 27, 2010

If you wonder if it’s something more than an anomaly that rabbis are taking the bull horn at ‘white nationalist’ rallies while ADL family members are inciting ‘Islamofascist terror’ you would benefit from Michael Hoffman’s talk, “The Masquerader’s Jest.”

Hoffman’s Revisionist History Store: Audio CDs

Scroll down to The Masqueraders’ Jest (Audio CD). Western Terror, Islamic Resistance and the Cryptocracy’s Great Game. 70 minutes of elite counterintelligence from Hoffman!

ADL Leader’s Grandson Attempting to Incite Muslims

October 24, 2010

This needs to be read in tandem with ‘Noahide Law’ Peddling Rabbi Incites the Mob re:Sharia Law. On one side we see a rabbi inciting the West against Muslims and on the other we see the daughter of an Israeli spy releasing a video of the grandson of an ADL leader dressed up as an ‘Islamofascist’ boogeyman inciting Muslims against the West.

Who is stoking terror and inciting us to make war against it? Who stands to benefit from this contrived ‘clash of civilizations’?

Racial supremacist Judaism in all its guises and deceits is an ally to no one.

American al-Qaida spokesman urges attacks in US

October 23, 2010 – Associated Press

CAIRO (AP) — A U.S.-born spokesman for al-Qaida on Saturday urged Muslims living in the United States and Europe to carry out attacks there, calling it a duty and an obligation. In a 48-minute video posted on militant websites, Adam Gadahn directed his appeal to Muslim immigrants in what he called the “miserable suburbs” of Paris, London and Detroit, as well as those traveling to the West to study or work.

“It is the duty of everyone who is sincere in his desire to defend Islam and Muslims today, to take the initiative to perform the individual obligation of jihad … by striking the Zio-Crusader interests,” he said, referring to Western and Jewish interests.

Gadahn, who has been hunted by the FBI since 2004, also sought to discredit attempts by moderate Muslim leaders to suppress the “jihadi awakening.”

He spoke in Arabic in the video, which was made available by the U.S.-based SITE Intelligence Group [which is run by the daughter of an Israeli spy whose questionable evidence of unknown providence is paid and acted on by the FBI and CIA and passed along uncritically by the U.S. establishment press] …

full article:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iLPm8gmHMKkizr_aTZAMTljzo6UQ?docId=dbbb24df48654019877178fa21c0131b

also see:

ADL Board Member’s Grandson Transformed as “al Qaeda” Agent Threatens “Islamofascist” Attack on U.S.

ADL Board Member’s Grandson Threatens More “Islamofascist” Attacks

The Israeli Interlocutor Writes …

June 8, 2010

“Actually this site seems to be a perfect affirmation of Esau soneh Yaakov, wouldn’t you say so?”

My response:

No.

I’m not Esau. You’re not Jacob. I’m not biologically programmed to hate Jews–real Jews or self-styled Jews. You’re not biologically programmed to be hated by non-Judaic people. You’re a victim of a sick *ideology* which deserves to vanish into obscurity every bit as much as it’s Nazi biological determinist ideological counterpart.

I don’t oppose a people. I don’t believe that the persons who today self-identify as “The Jews” even are a people in any substantial way other than tribal ideology. I oppose corrupt ideology and the corrupt behavior it engenders in individuals regardless of their biological background.

I urge all people to throw off the shackles of the rabbis and their protection racket in both its religious and secular guises.

November 5&6 2009 Terror Talisman

November 6, 2009

These numbers and symbols have no power. The Gospel has power, but it has been forsaken.

A 40-year-old man who was reportedly fired two years ago from an engineering firm apparently returned to that office Friday and shot six people, killing one, according to police and his former employer … Swat teams and ambulances descended on the 16-story [Orlando, Florida] Gateway Center office building after receiving reports of shots having been fired at 11 a.m. Friday morning … (1 dead in shooting at Orlando office building; suspect in custody Washington Post, Friday, November 6, 2009)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/06/AR2009110602294.html

"Popish Plot" Recast As "Islamofascist Plot"

November 6, 2009
The Execution of the Five Jesuits

On the Contrary: The Hoodwink in Texas

“He was making outlandish comments condemning our foreign policy and claimed Muslims had the right to rise up and attack Americans,” Col Lee told Fox News.

“He said Muslims should stand up and fight the aggressor and that we should not be in the war in the first place.” He said that Maj Hasan said he was “happy” when a US soldier was killed in an attack on a military recruitment centre in Arkansas in June. An American convert to Islam was accused of the shootings.

Col Lee alleged that other officers had told him that Maj Hasan had said “maybe people should strap bombs on themselves and go to Time Square” in New York. (Fort Hood shooting: Nidal Malik Hasan ‘said Muslims should rise up’ … Telegraph U.K. November 5, 2009)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6511591/Fort-Hood-shooting-Nidal-Malik-Hasan-said-Muslims-should-rise-up.html

Third Benedict XVI-George W. Bush Meeting Takes Place Amidst Speculation that Bush May Convert

June 13, 2008

Skull and Bones-warmonger-Zionist G.W. Bush has all of the proper credentials for a Benedict XVI-styled conversion.

Read about another of Benedict’s high-profile converts:

Benedict’s Easter “Muslim” Convert is a Zionist, Holocaustolator Zealot

More on Benedict’s Easter Baptism Spectacle

Further Background on Benedict’s Easter Muslim Convert Charade

Third Benedict XVI-George W. Bush Meeting Takes Place Amidst Speculation that Bush May Convert

June 13, 2008

Skull and Bones-warmonger-Zionist G.W. Bush has all of the proper credentials for a Benedict XVI-styled conversion.

Read about another of Benedict’s high-profile converts:

Benedict’s Easter “Muslim” Convert is a Zionist, Holocaustolator Zealot

More on Benedict’s Easter Baptism Spectacle

Further Background on Benedict’s Easter Muslim Convert Charade

Third Benedict XVI-George W. Bush Meeting Takes Place Amidst Speculation that Bush May Convert

June 13, 2008

Skull and Bones-warmonger-Zionist G.W. Bush has all of the proper credentials for a Benedict XVI-styled conversion.

Read about another of Benedict’s high-profile converts:

Benedict’s Easter “Muslim” Convert is a Zionist, Holocaustolator Zealot

More on Benedict’s Easter Baptism Spectacle

Further Background on Benedict’s Easter Muslim Convert Charade

"There’s No Place for Morals"

May 22, 2008

The opinion piece below written by Hebrew University of Jerusalem Professor, Yehezkel Dror is titled, “When Survival of the Jewish People Is at Stake, There’s No Place for Morals.” This is the rabbinic mentality in a single sentence–Judaism being a tribal racket, nothing takes precedence over the tribe. Couple this with rabbinic paranoia and dialectics and you have a self-perpetuating religious system of anti-morality. Any old “threat” will suffice. For example, the rabbis decry marriage of Judaic persons to “Gentile” “shiksas” and “shkutzim” as “a threat to the survival of the Jewish people” tantamount to another “Holocaust.” See:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2008/02/more-orthodox-racism.html

This is but one example. In truth, there has never been a time in 2000 years of Judaism when the rabbis have not been screaming of a threat of “genocide” of “The Jews.” Recall the Talmudic tall-tale of the Roman “genocide” of 4 BILLION Jews in one city, Bethar! (Gitin 57b). If the rabbis stopped summoning the specter of “genocide” of “The Jews” they would have to get real jobs.

There is never a time for true morality in Judaism, not that Judaism has any concept of true morality to begin with. What Yehezkel Dror is really saying is that there is no place for Christian, Biblical morals. That’s what the rabbis were saying during the 2006 Israeli destruction of Lebanon: that Christian moral standards weakened the resolve of the Israeli military and caused danger to “The Jews;” there are no innocent women and children on the “enemy” side during “war.” What the rabbis refer to as “war” is actually indiscriminate destruction of defenseless nations.

The astute among us will recognize this same rabbinic swindle at play in Washington D.C. where it is said that “preemptive” destruction, torture, the forfeiture of our God-given constitutional rights and the abandonment of Christian morality are all necessary due to “the Islamofascist threat.”

Alan Dershowitz spelled it out here:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2008/02/dershowitz-and-death-of-us.html

The proof text here is Babylonian Talmud Sanhedrin 46a. The rabbis say that the law can be put aside and a person can be executed or flogged, even if they haven’t broken any law, if the rabbis deem that “the times require it.”

When Survival of the Jewish People Is at Stake, There’s No Place for Morals

By Yehezkel Dror – Forward

Thu. May 15, 2008

There is little disagreement that every Jewish leader, organization, community and individual has a duty to help ensure the continuity of the Jewish people. But in a world where the long-term existence of the Jewish state is far from certain, the imperative to exist inevitably gives rise to difficult questions, foremost among them this: When the survival of the Jewish people conflicts with the morals of the Jewish people, is existence worthwhile, or even possible?

Physical existence, I would argue, must come first. No matter how moral a society aspires to be, physical existence must take precedent.

Clear external and internal dangers threaten the very existence of Israel as a Jewish state. It is very likely that the collapse of Israel or the loss of its Jewish nature would undermine the existence of the Jewish people as a whole. And even given the existence of a Jewish state, less clear but no less fateful dangers threaten the long-term sustainable existence of the Diaspora.

When the requirements of existence conflict with other values, therefore, realpolitik should be given priority. From the threat of a disastrous conflict with Islamist actors such as Iran, to the necessity of maintaining distinctions between “us” and “others” in order to limit assimilation, this imperative ought to guide policymakers.

Regrettably, human history refutes the idealistic claim that in order to exist for long, a state, society or people has to be moral. Given the foreseeable realities of the 21st century and beyond, harsh choices are unavoidable, with requirements of existence often contradicting other important values.

Some might argue that putting existence first may be counter-productive in terms of existence itself, because what may be regarded as immoral action can undermine external and internal support essential for existence. However, the calculus of realpolitik gives primacy to existence, leaving limited room for ethical considerations. The unfortunate reality is that the Jewish people may be faced with tragic choices in which important values have to be sacrificed for even more important ones.

Responsible decisions in such difficult situations require clear recognition of the involved moral issues, careful pondering of all relevant values and acceptance of responsibility for one’s autonomous judgment. They also demand an effort to reduce to a minimum the violation of moral values.

Nonetheless, when faced with such choices, the Jewish people ought not be captivated by political correctness and other thinking-repressing fashions. When it comes to China, for example, efforts to strengthen the rising superpower’s ties to the Jewish people should trump moral-minded campaigns to alter Beijing’s domestic policies and handling of Tibet. The same goes for Turkey: Given its crucial peacemaking role in the Middle East, discussion of whether the Ottomans committed genocide against the Armenians ought to be left to historians, preferably non-Jewish ones.

That is not necessarily to condone China’s policies, or to deny Armenian history. Rather, it is to recognize that however just such moral stances may or may not be, the Jewish people must give primacy to existence.

What is required is a priori pondering of values, so as to have guidelines ready for judgment in specific contexts and under crisis conditions. The overall issue is whether the imperative for the Jewish people to exist is a categorical one overriding nearly all other values, or one among many imperatives of similar standing. Given both the history and current situation of the Jewish people, I would argue that the imperative to assure existence is of overriding moral weight.

Let us leave aside reliance on transcendental arguments, biblical commands and sayings of the sages, all of which are open to various interpretations. The justification for giving priority to the needs of existence is four-fold.

First, the Jewish people has an inherent right to exist, just as any other people or civilization.

Second, a people that has been regularly persecuted for 2,000 years is entitled morally, in terms of distributive justice, to be very tough in taking care of its existence, including the moral right and even duty to kill and be killed if this is essential for assuring existence — even at the cost of other values and to other people. This argument is all the more compelling in light of the unprecedented killing only a few decades ago of a third of the Jewish people — mass murder that was supported directly and indirectly, or at least not prevented when possible, by large parts of the civilized world.

Third, given the history of Judaism and the Jewish people, there is a good chance that we will continue to make much-needed ethical contributions to humanity. However, in order to do so we require a stable existence.

Fourth, the State of Israel is the only democratic country whose very existence is endangered by deeply hostile actors, again, without the world taking decisive countermeasures. This justifies — indeed, requires — measures that would be not only unnecessary but also potentially immoral in other circumstances.

The Jewish people should give much more weight to the imperative to assure existence than to other values. There are, of course, limits; nothing can justify initiating genocide. But with the few exceptions where being killed and destroyed is better than transgressing against absolute and total norms, assuring the existence of the Jewish people, including a Jewish State of Israel, should be valued as a top priority.

Thus, if the security of Israel is significantly strengthened by good relations with Turkey and China, but in some views Turkey is guilty of genocide in the past against the Armenians and China of now repressing Tibetans and domestic opposition, Jewish leaders and organizations should support Turkey and China, or at least remain neutral when it comes to their affairs. At a minimum, Jewish leaders should not join the chorus of liberal and humanitarian actors condemning Turkey and China.

Similarly, Jewish leaders should support harsh measures against terrorists who potentially endanger Jews, even at the cost of human rights and humanitarian law. And if the threat is sufficiently grave, the use of weapons of mass destruction by Israel would be justified if likely to be necessary for assuring the state’s survival, the bitter price of large number of killed innocent civilians notwithstanding.

To be sure, there is much room for debate on what is really required for existence. Giving priority to the imperative to exist does not imply supporting each and every policy of Israel. Indeed, the opposite is true: Diaspora leaders, organizations and individuals have a duty to criticize Israeli policies that in their view endanger the Jewish state and the Jewish people’s existence, along with an obligation to propose alternative existence-assuring policies.

But at the end of the day there is no way around the tough and painful practical implications of prioritizing existence as an overriding moral norm over being moral in other respects. When important for existence, violating the rights of others should be accepted, with regret but with determination. Support or condemnation of various countries and their policies should be decided upon primarily in light of probable consequences for the existence of the Jewish people.

In short, the imperatives of existence should be given priority over other concerns — however important they may be — including liberal and humanitarian values, support for human rights and democratization.

This tragic but compelling conclusion is not easy to swallow, but it is essential for the future of the Jewish people. Once our existence is assured, including basic security for Israel, much can and should be sacrificed for tikkun olam. But given present and foreseeable realities, assuring existence must come first.

http://www.forward.com/articles/13388/