Archive for the ‘Traditional Catholic’ Category

The Remnant’s Conspicuous Blind Spot

November 17, 2010

“Sharia law is coming … the Crescent is rising,” says The Remnant’s Michael J. Matt. And how does he know this? Because in Minnesota, “Somali employees began refusing service to Minnesotans attempting to purchase bacon from the frozen food departments of local Target stores” and “[i]n addition, the Minneapolis Star Tribune reported on more than 5000 cases of Somali cab drivers refusing to pick up fares that failed various Sharia litmus tests.”

Whatever threat these minimum wage-earning Muslim immigrants may constitute I think it safe to call it negligible in comparison to a threat that Mr. Matt and his Remnant Resistance is conspicuously mute on: the coming of the ‘Noahide’ Laws and the rise of the Hexagram.

The Chief Rabbinate of the Israeli state which was able to force the Pope to alter the traditional Catholic liturgy HERE and to recognize Judaism’s oppressive legal system, the so-called ‘Noahide’ Laws HERE, has what one might call real power.

While it might seem like a threat to Michael Matt if a poor immigrant won’t serve him bacon or allow his dog into a taxi, an element that has the power to get the Pope to hack and slash traditional Catholic teaching is the greater threat to Catholics by a cosmic margin. How has Michael Matt and The Remnant Resistance missed this?

Is the Crescent rising? Perhaps it’s rising in a Minnesota Mosque attended by the Target store workers and taxi drivers that Mr. Matt fears, but the Crescent hasn’t risen nearly as high as the Hexagram on the Pope’s mitre.


Muslims haven’t pressured the Church to rewrite its liturgy and teaching materials, to apologize for its past and abandon many of its Saints and their teaching.

Muslims aren’t saturating our airwaves with attacks on our religion, morality, governing principles and culture.

There is no Muslim equivalent to Thomas Friedman selling the ‘Noahide’ Laws in the pages of the New York Times.

There is no Muslim equivalent to AIPAC, WJC, AJC, ADL, JPPPI, UJA, and the hundreds of other such Judaic power organizations and the pressure they bear on world governments, religious institutions, media and academia.

There is no Muslim equivalent to Chabad Lubavitch or Agudath Israel and the power they wield.

There is no Muslim equivalent to the 30′ tall Menorah that appears on the White House lawn each Hanukkah.

There is no Muslim equivalent to Benjamin Netanyahu pulling the strings of our president.

There are no equivalent Muslim subversives to Gregory Baum pushing Christians to scrap the Gospel of our religion and replace it with a crude counterfeit.

Muslims don’t force Western governments to imprison their citizens for doubting atrocities committed against them, much less overblown exaggerations.

Islam doesn’t sanction predatory, usurious financial chicanery.

It’s not Muslims who loosen immigration policy in Western nations while championing ‘Jewish’ state ethnic purity.

I prefer Jesus’ teaching to Michael Matt’s dishonest attempt at profundity:

You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt lose its savour, wherewith shall it be salted? It is good for nothing any more but to be cast out, and to be trodden on by men.

Indeed, the salt has lost its savour; the earth is no longer salted. We’re being trodden upon by men but it’s not minimum wage-earning Muslims.

It’s never too late to turn back. If we’ve forgotten what it means to stand for beliefs and principles then perhaps we might benefit from the example of these poor immigrants that Michael Matt so fears.

A New Brazillian Catholic Traditionalist Website

September 20, 2008

http://www.istoecatolico.com.br/

A New Brazillian Catholic Traditionalist Website

September 20, 2008

http://www.istoecatolico.com.br/

Hopeless

September 26, 2007

More confused “traditional Catholic” journalism related to Orthodox Judaic rabbis; relativizing traditional Catholic prayers for conversion of Judaic souls with Judaic racist, “prayers” of self-glorification and derision of non-“Jews”; getting played by the dialectic between foaming-at-the-mouth Foxman and “reasonable” Rabbi Neusner …

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/archive-2007-0831-ecumenical_dialogue.htm

Rabbi Neusner posits a “fair” comparison between a Catholic prayer for the souls of Judaics and a racist, self-worshipping Judaic “prayer” of derision against non-“Jews” and a “traditional Catholic” journalist parrots that sophistry to his readers. And just as Rabbi Neusner, that “traditional Catholic,” out of ignorance or otherwise, God knows, makes no mention of the curse which Orthodox Judaics utter against Christians, birkat ha minim, three times daily as part of the shmoneh esre, or any of the mandatory Orthodox Judaic curses on Christian churches and graveyards.

There is a debate shaping up on this matter which is due to a great deal of sacrifice on the part of people other than “trads” like Alessio. That debate will not be won by sloppyness, half-measures and double-mindedness from “balanced” “traditional Catholics.”

Hopeless

September 26, 2007

More confused “traditional Catholic” journalism related to Orthodox Judaic rabbis; relativizing traditional Catholic prayers for conversion of Judaic souls with Judaic racist, “prayers” of self-glorification and derision of non-“Jews”; getting played by the dialectic between foaming-at-the-mouth Foxman and “reasonable” Rabbi Neusner …

http://www.remnantnewspaper.com/Archives/archive-2007-0831-ecumenical_dialogue.htm

Rabbi Neusner posits a “fair” comparison between a Catholic prayer for the souls of Judaics and a racist, self-worshipping Judaic “prayer” of derision against non-“Jews” and a “traditional Catholic” journalist parrots that sophistry to his readers. And just as Rabbi Neusner, that “traditional Catholic,” out of ignorance or otherwise, God knows, makes no mention of the curse which Orthodox Judaics utter against Christians, birkat ha minim, three times daily as part of the shmoneh esre, or any of the mandatory Orthodox Judaic curses on Christian churches and graveyards.

There is a debate shaping up on this matter which is due to a great deal of sacrifice on the part of people other than “trads” like Alessio. That debate will not be won by sloppyness, half-measures and double-mindedness from “balanced” “traditional Catholics.”

The Inquisition of John Sharpe

March 13, 2007

Many of you are probably aware of the witch hunt that’s been going on recently which is focused on the traditional Catholic community. Recently the Stalinist outfit, the SPLC has issued a hit piece focused on traditional Catholics. I didn’t find the SPLC botch job worth commenting on here as anyone reading this blog knows to expect such things from them.

What I find to be noteworthy is what appears to be either hopelessly confused individuals or ADL/SPLC plants within the traditional Catholic internet community who’ve been toeing the ADL/SPLC line to such a degree that they make Abe Foxman and Morris Dees seem reasonable, and that’s not an easy thing to do. I don’t intend to mention these individuals by name because they represent a marginal voice struggling for recognition which they do not deserve, so I will not give it to them. I’m also of the opinion that they discredit themselves so incredibly effectively that it would be counterproductive for me to interfere. I trust that the readers of this blog will be able to identify these villains in our midst and alert their friends and family members to their presence.

They’re very easy to identify. If they’re more outraged about offenses to the sensibilities of “the Jews” than they are about attacks against our Lord and the Gospel, that’s one clue. If they focus inordinately on Auschwitz and not very much on Calvary, that’s another clue. If they claim that it’s “antisemitic” to be opposed to the religion of Judaism and the Zionist movement, that’s a strong clue. If they take for granted that Catholics should support the Zionist state, that’s a red flag. If they conflate the Old Testament religion of the faithful Israelites with the anti-Christ tradition of Judaism in their apologetics, that’s a strong indicator. If they insist on associating a direct lineage between the people who today call themselves “Jews” and the Jews of the Bible, that’s cause for suspicion as well. If they make common cause with the rabbis of Judaism, that is a very serious concern which cannot be ignored.

It’s been educational for me to witness these scoundrels and their slanderous, unsubstantiated, Abe Foxman-like attacks on John Sharpe. Their attacks have coincided with the SPLC hit piece on traditional Catholics which also targeted John Sharpe. Due to these efforts and others, Lt. Cmdr. Sharpe, U.S. Navy, has been suspended of his duties pending an investigation into alleged “antisemitic” associations.

So the the Judaic inquisition is apparently operating within traditional Catholicism and in the US military.

Sharpe’s parents have circulated the following letter:

Dear All:

In the interest of defending our son John’s public reputation, we’re writing to ask if you would be willing to assist by writing a letter to the editor of the NAVY TIMES(mailto:navylet@atpco) in response to the article they published on their website last Friday evening (See article below).

Incredibly, the article included a statement from Jim Brantley, a Navy spokesman, clearly stating that John is violating Navy regulations which prohibit “supremacist”
activity: “Evidently he’s affiliated with an anti-Semitic group , and that’s illegal in the U.S. Navy .” Brantley cited Navy Regulation 1167, which states, “No person in the Naval Service shall participate in any organization that espouses supremacist causes.”

Brantley made the leap from mere accusations of anti-Semitism, to (1) it being EVIDENT that John’s associated with an anti-Semitic group . (It certainly is NOT evident; the investigation has hardly begun yet .) And that (2), it being equivalent to “supremacist” activity (says who?) and (3) this is evidence of a violation of Navy Regulations. Brantley’s statement has John guilty of “supremacist activity” without qualification.

We ask that you request that the editor publish a correction of the record and/or a retraction that at least gives John the benefit of the doubt while the investigation is underway.

The other point concerns the NAVY TIMES urging people to “Read what the Southern Poverty Law Center had to say about Sharpe.” Where’s the fairness here? How about a recommendation that people also hear John’s side of the story? Just because the SPLC makes an allegation does that make it fact? This should pointed out to the NAVY TIMES editor.

FYI, and for use or not as you see fit, here’s an example of SPLC’s “unbiased” reporting. In their “Intelligence Report,” which is the basis for the charges against John, (http://www.splcente%20r.org/intel/%20intelreport/%20article.jsp?) they refer to the Neo-CONNED! books published by IHS Press as containing “several articles by racists and anti-Semites.” Of course they don’t identify these articles or their authors. Moreover, they fail to point out that the books contain several articles by well-known Jewish authors such as Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Paul Gottfried, Immanuel Wallerstein, and Jeff Steinberg. So much for balanced reporting.

We appreciate your time and efforts on John’s behalf. And please, a second request, keep him and his family in your prayers.

Thank you and God bless you,
Judith and John
Sharpe

PS Here’s a link to our local newspaper where a similar article ran on the front page Saturday morning. The Virginian-Pilot article is slightly fairer than the NAVY TIMES article, but leaves way too much unreported. If you wish to write to them also, please, be our guest. http://content.%20hamptonroads.%20com/story.%20cfm?story=120893&ran=124140

The Inquisition of John Sharpe

March 13, 2007

Many of you are probably aware of the witch hunt that’s been going on recently which is focused on the traditional Catholic community. Recently the Stalinist outfit, the SPLC has issued a hit piece focused on traditional Catholics. I didn’t find the SPLC botch job worth commenting on here as anyone reading this blog knows to expect such things from them.

What I find to be noteworthy is what appears to be either hopelessly confused individuals or ADL/SPLC plants within the traditional Catholic internet community who’ve been toeing the ADL/SPLC line to such a degree that they make Abe Foxman and Morris Dees seem reasonable, and that’s not an easy thing to do. I don’t intend to mention these individuals by name because they represent a marginal voice struggling for recognition which they do not deserve, so I will not give it to them. I’m also of the opinion that they discredit themselves so incredibly effectively that it would be counterproductive for me to interfere. I trust that the readers of this blog will be able to identify these villains in our midst and alert their friends and family members to their presence.

They’re very easy to identify. If they’re more outraged about offenses to the sensibilities of “the Jews” than they are about attacks against our Lord and the Gospel, that’s one clue. If they focus inordinately on Auschwitz and not very much on Calvary, that’s another clue. If they claim that it’s “antisemitic” to be opposed to the religion of Judaism and the Zionist movement, that’s a strong clue. If they take for granted that Catholics should support the Zionist state, that’s a red flag. If they conflate the Old Testament religion of the faithful Israelites with the anti-Christ tradition of Judaism in their apologetics, that’s a strong indicator. If they insist on associating a direct lineage between the people who today call themselves “Jews” and the Jews of the Bible, that’s cause for suspicion as well. If they make common cause with the rabbis of Judaism, that is a very serious concern which cannot be ignored.

It’s been educational for me to witness these scoundrels and their slanderous, unsubstantiated, Abe Foxman-like attacks on John Sharpe. Their attacks have coincided with the SPLC hit piece on traditional Catholics which also targeted John Sharpe. Due to these efforts and others, Lt. Cmdr. Sharpe, U.S. Navy, has been suspended of his duties pending an investigation into alleged “antisemitic” associations.

So the the Judaic inquisition is apparently operating within traditional Catholicism and in the US military.

Sharpe’s parents have circulated the following letter:

Dear All:

In the interest of defending our son John’s public reputation, we’re writing to ask if you would be willing to assist by writing a letter to the editor of the NAVY TIMES(mailto:navylet@atpco) in response to the article they published on their website last Friday evening (See article below).

Incredibly, the article included a statement from Jim Brantley, a Navy spokesman, clearly stating that John is violating Navy regulations which prohibit “supremacist”
activity: “Evidently he’s affiliated with an anti-Semitic group , and that’s illegal in the U.S. Navy .” Brantley cited Navy Regulation 1167, which states, “No person in the Naval Service shall participate in any organization that espouses supremacist causes.”

Brantley made the leap from mere accusations of anti-Semitism, to (1) it being EVIDENT that John’s associated with an anti-Semitic group . (It certainly is NOT evident; the investigation has hardly begun yet .) And that (2), it being equivalent to “supremacist” activity (says who?) and (3) this is evidence of a violation of Navy Regulations. Brantley’s statement has John guilty of “supremacist activity” without qualification.

We ask that you request that the editor publish a correction of the record and/or a retraction that at least gives John the benefit of the doubt while the investigation is underway.

The other point concerns the NAVY TIMES urging people to “Read what the Southern Poverty Law Center had to say about Sharpe.” Where’s the fairness here? How about a recommendation that people also hear John’s side of the story? Just because the SPLC makes an allegation does that make it fact? This should pointed out to the NAVY TIMES editor.

FYI, and for use or not as you see fit, here’s an example of SPLC’s “unbiased” reporting. In their “Intelligence Report,” which is the basis for the charges against John, (http://www.splcente%20r.org/intel/%20intelreport/%20article.jsp?) they refer to the Neo-CONNED! books published by IHS Press as containing “several articles by racists and anti-Semites.” Of course they don’t identify these articles or their authors. Moreover, they fail to point out that the books contain several articles by well-known Jewish authors such as Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Paul Gottfried, Immanuel Wallerstein, and Jeff Steinberg. So much for balanced reporting.

We appreciate your time and efforts on John’s behalf. And please, a second request, keep him and his family in your prayers.

Thank you and God bless you,
Judith and John
Sharpe

PS Here’s a link to our local newspaper where a similar article ran on the front page Saturday morning. The Virginian-Pilot article is slightly fairer than the NAVY TIMES article, but leaves way too much unreported. If you wish to write to them also, please, be our guest. http://content.%20hamptonroads.%20com/story.%20cfm?story=120893&ran=124140

Traditional Catholics and Traditional Rabbis mix White with Black

February 22, 2007

From an article titled, “Christophobes at the Gates” written by Christopher Ferrara and published by The Remnant:

…But there are many Jews of good will who oppose this Christophobic campaign. Perhaps the most dramatic example is Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, founder of Toward Tradition. Rabbi Lapin’s public record is full of courageous statements of opposition to the Christophobes …

Lapin is also on congressional record as being an accomplice to Zionist megalobbyist and convicted felon, Jack Abramoff who, among many other crimes, defrauded Native American tribes and used the proceeds to purchase weapons and night vision goggles for Israeli “settlers.”

Lapin and Abramoff had a long history of collaboration together:

WASHINGTON — In September 2000, before he became a target of federal investigations, Jack Abramoff was blazing a trail as a superlobbyist for Seattle-based Preston Gates & Ellis, bringing in millions of dollars in fees and earning a reputation as one of the town’s premier influence traffickers.

So it wasn’t surprising that Abramoff was nominated to join the Cosmos Club, one of Washington’s most selective private clubs. For Abramoff, it was a major honor and yet another avenue to pursue his trade.

But Abramoff worried that his resume wasn’t substantial enough to compete with a membership that includes senior government officials, ambassadors, Nobel Prize winners and business leaders.

The solution, Abramoff decided, was Mercer Island rabbi and Seattle talk-show host Daniel Lapin.

Lapin is far more than a local rabbi. He is a major player in the conservative religious movement, well known for his Toward Tradition, an organization that has a goal of “working to advance our nation toward the traditional Judeo-Christian values.”

It was Lapin who introduced Abramoff to House majority leader Tom DeLay of Texas. Abramoff, in turn, helped Lapin establish Toward Tradition, and he named Lapin’s brother, David, to a position at Eshkol Academy, a now-defunct private school in Columbia, Md., created by Abramoff that promised a high-quality Orthodox Jewish education.

Toward Tradition was just the kind of outfit Abramoff needed.

In an e-mail to Lapin on Sept. 15, 2000, with “HELP!” in the subject line, Abramoff described his dilemma. “Most prospective members have received awards and I have received none,” he wrote.

“I was wondering if you thought it possible that I could put that I have received an award from Toward Tradition with a sufficient academic title, perhaps something like Scholar of Talmudic Studies?”

On Sept. 18, Lapin wrote to Abramoff: “Let’s organize your many prestigious awards so they’re ready to ‘hang on the wall.’ “

That same day, Lapin to Abramoff: “Yes, I just need to know what needs to be produced … letters? Plaques? Neither?”

The next day, Abramoff to Lapin: “Probably just a few clever titles of awards, dates and that’s it. As long as you can be the person to verify them (or we can have someone else verify one and you the other), we should be set. Do you have any creative titles or should I dip into my bag of tricks?”

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/229692_lapin23.html

This is who The Remnant tells us is a “Jew of good will.” One wonders, what does it take to be considered a “Jew” of bad will in The Remnant’s estimation? It’s not enough that Rabbi Lapin is a Zionist of the most extreme bent; that he’s an upholder of the anti-Christ Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions; that he’s a rabbinic infiltrator of Christian circles; that he was an accomplice to a convicted felon and agent of the Zionist state?

The Remnant’s article continues:

Lapin is “a strong supporter of Pope Pius XII as a righteous gentile, a term he believes should be renamed ‘righteous Christian.’”

Since when has the opinion of a rabbi of the Talmud and Kabbalah been a gauge of any value whatever pertaining to Catholic matters? Who cares what Rabbi Lapin thinks about Pius XII? The entire Pius XII issue is a complete resource drainer like so much other nonsense occupying the minds of traditional Catholics today. And to be considered a “righteous gentile” (see:Noahide) by a rabbi is no Christian virtue. But here is The Remnant passing that rabbinic notion with their endorsement along to their readers.

The Remnant article goes on:

He has “lamented that the Holocaust Memorial Museum presents anti-Christian propaganda…”

Of course he has. It’s precisely this way that Lapin has built inroads into the Christian camp. The attacks of the SPLC, The Holocaust Memorial Museum, the ADL, et al, have made it possible for Lapin to do so. Meanwhile the liberal rabbis continue their attack from without as he and his fellow infiltrating rabbis work from within, now aided by The Remnant.

But has Rabbi Lapin lamented the fact that the Holocaust Memorial Museum is in essence a U.S. taxpayer funded yeshiva for the new state religion of Holocaustolatry? Is he lobbying for the creation of an equal number of museums dedicated to the memory of the millions of Christians holocausted by the Judaic Bolsheviks? No? Then how is it that this blatant upholder of the rabbinic double standard has been baptised a “Jew of good will” by The Remnant? Who’s interest does The Remnant serve here?

More from The Remnant’s article:

Lapin has warned that “the biggest danger to the Jewish people is not Christianity but secular liberalism.”

Of course Lapin says that. He’s a Kabbalist playing the right pillar against the left for God’s sake. THAT’S WHAT KABBALISTS DO.

And the gutless, toothless, suicidal “Christianity” of our time–where “traditionalist” Catholics join forces with traditionalist rabbis in “restoring Christian society” (could there be a more insane notion?)–poses no threat to Lapin or his fellow rabbis to speak of. “Christians” today are the rabbis’ golem. Look how prepared they are to go kill the rabbis’ enemies in the Middle East. Look how they welcome the rabbis into their camp and praise them with glowing endorsements. The rabbis could never generate such valuable advertisement for themselves and their tradition as The Remnant has.

I could go on and on, but what’s the use? The truth about the anti-Christ and anti-Christian nature of the rabbis and their tradition of trickery and double standards is available to anyone able to read in the work of Johannes Andreas Eisenmenger, Johan Buxtorf and Rev. Pranaitis from centuries ago and modern scholars, Michael A. Hoffman and Craig Heimbichner. Those who haven’t fallen into the state of disorientation which the author of the Remnant article apparently has will understand the matter clearly and shun the rabbis and their Kabbalistic pillar-play in keeping with the true Christian tradition. The rest I leave in God’s hands. I harbor no illusions of being able to penetrate the hypnosis they labor under.

Traditional Catholics and Traditional Rabbis mix White with Black

February 22, 2007

From an article titled, “Christophobes at the Gates” written by Christopher Ferrara and published by The Remnant:

…But there are many Jews of good will who oppose this Christophobic campaign. Perhaps the most dramatic example is Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, founder of Toward Tradition. Rabbi Lapin’s public record is full of courageous statements of opposition to the Christophobes …

Lapin is also on congressional record as being an accomplice to Zionist megalobbyist and convicted felon, Jack Abramoff who, among many other crimes, defrauded Native American tribes and used the proceeds to purchase weapons and night vision goggles for Israeli “settlers.”

Lapin and Abramoff had a long history of collaboration together:

WASHINGTON — In September 2000, before he became a target of federal investigations, Jack Abramoff was blazing a trail as a superlobbyist for Seattle-based Preston Gates & Ellis, bringing in millions of dollars in fees and earning a reputation as one of the town’s premier influence traffickers.

So it wasn’t surprising that Abramoff was nominated to join the Cosmos Club, one of Washington’s most selective private clubs. For Abramoff, it was a major honor and yet another avenue to pursue his trade.

But Abramoff worried that his resume wasn’t substantial enough to compete with a membership that includes senior government officials, ambassadors, Nobel Prize winners and business leaders.

The solution, Abramoff decided, was Mercer Island rabbi and Seattle talk-show host Daniel Lapin.

Lapin is far more than a local rabbi. He is a major player in the conservative religious movement, well known for his Toward Tradition, an organization that has a goal of “working to advance our nation toward the traditional Judeo-Christian values.”

It was Lapin who introduced Abramoff to House majority leader Tom DeLay of Texas. Abramoff, in turn, helped Lapin establish Toward Tradition, and he named Lapin’s brother, David, to a position at Eshkol Academy, a now-defunct private school in Columbia, Md., created by Abramoff that promised a high-quality Orthodox Jewish education.

Toward Tradition was just the kind of outfit Abramoff needed.

In an e-mail to Lapin on Sept. 15, 2000, with “HELP!” in the subject line, Abramoff described his dilemma. “Most prospective members have received awards and I have received none,” he wrote.

“I was wondering if you thought it possible that I could put that I have received an award from Toward Tradition with a sufficient academic title, perhaps something like Scholar of Talmudic Studies?”

On Sept. 18, Lapin wrote to Abramoff: “Let’s organize your many prestigious awards so they’re ready to ‘hang on the wall.’ “

That same day, Lapin to Abramoff: “Yes, I just need to know what needs to be produced … letters? Plaques? Neither?”

The next day, Abramoff to Lapin: “Probably just a few clever titles of awards, dates and that’s it. As long as you can be the person to verify them (or we can have someone else verify one and you the other), we should be set. Do you have any creative titles or should I dip into my bag of tricks?”

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/229692_lapin23.html

This is who The Remnant tells us is a “Jew of good will.” One wonders, what does it take to be considered a “Jew” of bad will in The Remnant’s estimation? It’s not enough that Rabbi Lapin is a Zionist of the most extreme bent; that he’s an upholder of the anti-Christ Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions; that he’s a rabbinic infiltrator of Christian circles; that he was an accomplice to a convicted felon and agent of the Zionist state?

The Remnant’s article continues:

Lapin is “a strong supporter of Pope Pius XII as a righteous gentile, a term he believes should be renamed ‘righteous Christian.’”

Since when has the opinion of a rabbi of the Talmud and Kabbalah been a gauge of any value whatever pertaining to Catholic matters? Who cares what Rabbi Lapin thinks about Pius XII? The entire Pius XII issue is a complete resource drainer like so much other nonsense occupying the minds of traditional Catholics today. And to be considered a “righteous gentile” (see:Noahide) by a rabbi is no Christian virtue. But here is The Remnant passing that rabbinic notion with their endorsement along to their readers.

The Remnant article goes on:

He has “lamented that the Holocaust Memorial Museum presents anti-Christian propaganda…”

Of course he has. It’s precisely this way that Lapin has built inroads into the Christian camp. The attacks of the SPLC, The Holocaust Memorial Museum, the ADL, et al, have made it possible for Lapin to do so. Meanwhile the liberal rabbis continue their attack from without as he and his fellow infiltrating rabbis work from within, now aided by The Remnant.

But has Rabbi Lapin lamented the fact that the Holocaust Memorial Museum is in essence a U.S. taxpayer funded yeshiva for the new state religion of Holocaustolatry? Is he lobbying for the creation of an equal number of museums dedicated to the memory of the millions of Christians holocausted by the Judaic Bolsheviks? No? Then how is it that this blatant upholder of the rabbinic double standard has been baptised a “Jew of good will” by The Remnant? Whose interest does The Remnant serve here?

More from The Remnant’s article:

Lapin has warned that “the biggest danger to the Jewish people is not Christianity but secular liberalism.”

Of course Lapin says that. He’s a Kabbalist playing the right pillar against the left for God’s sake. THAT’S WHAT KABBALISTS DO.

And the gutless, toothless, suicidal “Christianity” of our time–where “traditionalist” Catholics join forces with traditionalist rabbis in “restoring Christian society” (could there be a more insane notion?)–poses no threat to Lapin or his fellow rabbis to speak of. “Christians” today are the rabbis’ golem. Look how prepared they are to go kill the rabbis’ enemies in the Middle East. Look how they welcome the rabbis into their camp and praise them with glowing endorsements. The rabbis could never generate such valuable advertisement for themselves and their tradition as The Remnant has.

I could go on and on, but what’s the use? The truth about the anti-Christ and anti-Christian nature of the rabbis and their tradition of trickery and double standards is available to anyone able to read in the work of Johannes Andreas Eisenmenger, Johan Buxtorf and Rev. Pranaitis from centuries ago and modern scholars, Michael A. Hoffman and Craig Heimbichner. Those who haven’t fallen into the state of disorientation which the author of the Remnant article apparently has will understand the matter clearly and shun the rabbis and their Kabbalistic pillar-play in keeping with the true Christian tradition. The rest I leave in God’s hands. I harbor no illusions of being able to penetrate the hypnosis they labor under.

ADL’s Joseph L. Lichten: Vatican II Change Agent, Vatican Knight Defender of Talmud

February 6, 2007

ADL Dr. Joseph L. Lichten Award In Catholic-Jewish Relations


The Anti-Defamation League Dr. Joseph L. Lichten Award in Catholic-Jewish Relations was established in 2005 to coincide with the 40th anniversary of Nostra Aetate, part of the Second Vatican Council’s reforms that changed the nature of the relationship between the Catholic Church and the Jewish community. The Award is named in honor of Joseph Lichten, ADL’s Director of Catholic-Jewish Relations, who was present throughout the deliberations of Vatican II and was one of the significant figures in the history of the Second Vatican Council.

Dr. Joseph Lichten, with a PhD in Catholic Canon Law, was born and educated in Poland. From 1941-1945 he served as a consultant and advisor on eastern European affairs to the embassy of the Polish government in exile. When the Communists took control of his native country, he left its diplomatic service and became an American citizen.

Dr. Lichten joined ADL in 1945. In 1953 he started the very first Catholic-Jewish dialogue in the United States. Over the years, he organized and participated in hundreds of ADL Catholic-Jewish interfaith conferences, workshops and colloquia with Catholic clergy, scholars and lay leaders.

As head of ADL’s Vatican Liaison Office, he was given the rare gift of an office in the Vatican itself and he continued to teach at the North American college, where only the finest young Americans studying for the priesthood are privileged to attend.

In 1986 Pope John Paul II named him a knight commander of the pontifical equestrian order of St. Gregory the Great, the first American Jew to be so honored “for conspicuous virtue and notable accomplishment on behalf of the Roman Catholic church and society.”

During the deliberations of the Second Vatican council, he gave every bishop a copy of an ADL-sponsored survey of American anti-Semitism which pointed out the influence of the deicide charge on American Catholics. The final council vote on Nostra Aetate showed the church’s special concern and Joe Lichten’s profound influence.

——————————————————————————–
The first ADL Dr. Joseph L. Lichten Award in Catholic-Jewish Relations was presented to Walter Cardinal Kasper, President of the Pontifical Council for Promoting Christian Unity and President of the Pontifical Commission on Religious Relations with the Jews, in Rome, on December 15, 2005.

http://www.adl.org/Interfaith/lichten_award.asp