Archive for the ‘Syria’ Category

Turkish People Protest Interlopers’ Provocation of War Against Syria

October 6, 2012
I redirect your attention from the Iran hysteria, briefly. Syria and Lebanon are squarely in the path of an attack on Iran.

Advertisements

Fanatical Judaic Con Man, Bernard-Henry Lévy: same old scheme

August 1, 2012
‘Holocaust’ sophist, player of the Great Game, Bernard Henry ‘Lévy’ is angling for the overthrow and destruction of another nation in the path of the Greater ‘Israel’ delusion.

Also see:

 Fanatical Judaic Con Man Tells of Insider Role In NATO’s Purim Vengeance Against Libya

Mossad vs Assad? ‘CIA death squads behind Syria bloodbath’

November 23, 2011

Also see:

“Targeting of Christian Syrians and Black Libyans: The ‘Clash of Civilizations’ is on the march,” by Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya

A Christian exodus is being planned for the Middle East by Washington, Tel Aviv, and Brussels. It has been reported that Sheikh Al-Rahi was told in Paris by President Nicolas Sarkozy that the Christian communities of the Levant and Middle East can resettle in the European Union. This is no gracious offer. It is a slap in the face by the same powers that have deliberately created the conditions to eradicate the ancient Christian communities of the Middle East. The aim appears to be either the resettling of the Christian communities outside of the region or demarcate them in enclaves. Both could be objectives. This is meant to delineate the Arab nations along the lines of being exclusively Muslim nations and falls into accordance with the Yinon Plan.

More Warmongering from Bush and Cheney’s Warmongering Court "Jew," David Wurmser

October 5, 2007

What an amazing misuse of the collective “we.”

US ‘must break Iran and Syria regimes’

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Last Updated: 2:09am BST 05/10/2007

America should seize every opportunity to force regime change in Syria and Iran, a former senior adviser to the White House has urged.

We need to do everything possible to destabilise the Syrian regime and exploit every single moment they strategically overstep,” said David Wurmser, who recently resigned after four years as Vice President Dick Cheney’s Middle East adviser.

“That would include the willingness to escalate as far as we need to go to topple the regime if necessary.” He said that an end to Baathist rule in Damascus could trigger a domino effect that would then bring down the Teheran regime.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, the first since he left government, he argued that the United States had to be prepared to attack both Syria and Iran to prevent the spread of Islamic fundamentalism and nuclear proliferation in the Middle East that could result in a much wider war.

Mr Wurmser, 46, a leading neo-conservative who has played a pivotal role in the Bush administration since the September 11th attacks, said that diplomacy would fail to stop Iran becoming a nuclear power. Overthrowing Teheran’s theocratic regime should therefore be a top US priority.

… Limited strikes against Iranian nuclear targets would be useless, Mr Wurmser said. … “If we start shooting, we must be prepared to fire the last shot. Don’t shoot a bear if you’re not going to kill it” …

“If we decided from no preparation to doing something in Iran, while it would cause a lot of heartburn among many people in the Pentagon, we could do it.

“I would never underestimate the raw capability of the United States in any off-the-shelf situation. If that’s what we decided to do, things can be done.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=B2QZ1SL21V1X3QFIQMFSFF4AVCBQ0IV0?xml=/news/2007/10/05/wiran105.xml

More Warmongering from Bush and Cheney’s Warmongering Court "Jew," David Wurmser

October 5, 2007

What an amazing misuse of the collective “we.”

US ‘must break Iran and Syria regimes’

By Toby Harnden in Washington
Last Updated: 2:09am BST 05/10/2007

America should seize every opportunity to force regime change in Syria and Iran, a former senior adviser to the White House has urged.

We need to do everything possible to destabilise the Syrian regime and exploit every single moment they strategically overstep,” said David Wurmser, who recently resigned after four years as Vice President Dick Cheney’s Middle East adviser.

“That would include the willingness to escalate as far as we need to go to topple the regime if necessary.” He said that an end to Baathist rule in Damascus could trigger a domino effect that would then bring down the Teheran regime.

In an interview with The Daily Telegraph, the first since he left government, he argued that the United States had to be prepared to attack both Syria and Iran to prevent the spread of Islamic fundamentalism and nuclear proliferation in the Middle East that could result in a much wider war.

Mr Wurmser, 46, a leading neo-conservative who has played a pivotal role in the Bush administration since the September 11th attacks, said that diplomacy would fail to stop Iran becoming a nuclear power. Overthrowing Teheran’s theocratic regime should therefore be a top US priority.

… Limited strikes against Iranian nuclear targets would be useless, Mr Wurmser said. … “If we start shooting, we must be prepared to fire the last shot. Don’t shoot a bear if you’re not going to kill it” …

“If we decided from no preparation to doing something in Iran, while it would cause a lot of heartburn among many people in the Pentagon, we could do it.

“I would never underestimate the raw capability of the United States in any off-the-shelf situation. If that’s what we decided to do, things can be done.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml;jsessionid=B2QZ1SL21V1X3QFIQMFSFF4AVCBQ0IV0?xml=/news/2007/10/05/wiran105.xml

Goodbye Aquinas and Just War Theory, Hello Maimonides and Law of the Jungle

May 4, 2007

EDITOR’S NOTE: Last summer the Israeli state executed a 33 day long planned attack against Lebanon destroying it’s civilian infrastructure, bombing civilian neighborhoods, killing 10 civilians for every militant and finishing it’s brutality by littering the countryside with cluster bombs which continue to kill and maim civilians–mostly children–to this day. Thankfully, there was just enough Christian decency left in the increasingly Judaized world for a significant percentage of the population to recognize, if only briefly, the barbaric nature of the Israelis’ actions. This is a serious problem to the Judaic agenda which holds fixed principles, particularly Christian principles, and universal standards to be intolerable. Last year’s brutality against Lebanon will certainly not be the last such action from the Israelis and they intend to continue their brutality without incurring any further public relations disasters. So, what to do?

Israeli, US intellectuals chart new rules of war for insurgencies

Last summer, at the height of the Second Lebanon War, two intellectuals specializing in security affairs met for a conversation. For the Israeli of the pair, the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya’s Boaz Ganor, it was an opportunity to vent his frustration.

“We talked about the frustration we had over how the world was relating to the war, mainly the claim that Israel wasn’t responding with ‘proportionality,'” Ganor told The Jerusalem Post this week.

… “We decided we had to establish an international team” – experts have been consulted from Canada, Australia and elsewhere – “that will relate to Hague and Geneva, which are very good, but will try to fine tune them for the new situation,” Ganor said.

With monthly video-conference calls between Israel and Syracuse, New York, the team has begun to lay the groundwork for the document they hope to present in Washington D.C. in October – the 100th anniversary of the Hague Convention.

… “The primary goal is to protect civilians,” Ganor said emphatically. “That’s the sacred principle behind this.

Its implications are far from simple. As Ganor explains: “Take the mista’arvim [the IDF infiltration units that dress as Arabs and enter Arab towns to conduct operations] for example. On the face of it, it’s a clear breach of the Geneva Conventions, which demand clear separation between fighting forces and civilians, with ‘a badge and a flag.’ On the other hand, it’s by far the most selective and safe means of arresting or even assassinating someone …”

Full Article:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1177591142883&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Goodbye Aquinas and Just War Theory, Hello Maimonides and Law of the Jungle

May 4, 2007

EDITOR’S NOTE: Last summer the Israeli state executed a 33 day long planned attack against Lebanon destroying it’s civilian infrastructure, bombing civilian neighborhoods, killing 10 civilians for every militant and finishing it’s brutality by littering the countryside with cluster bombs which continue to kill and maim civilians–mostly children–to this day. Thankfully, there was just enough Christian decency left in the increasingly Judaized world for a significant percentage of the population to recognize, if only briefly, the barbaric nature of the Israelis’ actions. This is a serious problem to the Judaic agenda which holds fixed principles, particularly Christian principles, and universal standards to be intolerable. Last year’s brutality against Lebanon will certainly not be the last such action from the Israelis and they intend to continue their brutality without incurring any further public relations disasters. So, what to do?

Israeli, US intellectuals chart new rules of war for insurgencies

Last summer, at the height of the Second Lebanon War, two intellectuals specializing in security affairs met for a conversation. For the Israeli of the pair, the Interdisciplinary Center Herzliya’s Boaz Ganor, it was an opportunity to vent his frustration.

“We talked about the frustration we had over how the world was relating to the war, mainly the claim that Israel wasn’t responding with ‘proportionality,'” Ganor told The Jerusalem Post this week.

… “We decided we had to establish an international team” – experts have been consulted from Canada, Australia and elsewhere – “that will relate to Hague and Geneva, which are very good, but will try to fine tune them for the new situation,” Ganor said.

With monthly video-conference calls between Israel and Syracuse, New York, the team has begun to lay the groundwork for the document they hope to present in Washington D.C. in October – the 100th anniversary of the Hague Convention.

… “The primary goal is to protect civilians,” Ganor said emphatically. “That’s the sacred principle behind this.

Its implications are far from simple. As Ganor explains: “Take the mista’arvim [the IDF infiltration units that dress as Arabs and enter Arab towns to conduct operations] for example. On the face of it, it’s a clear breach of the Geneva Conventions, which demand clear separation between fighting forces and civilians, with ‘a badge and a flag.’ On the other hand, it’s by far the most selective and safe means of arresting or even assassinating someone …”

Full Article:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1177591142883&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull