Archive for the ‘SPLC’ Category

SPLC Thought Cops Smeared St. Benedict Center

November 9, 2007

The SPLC’s predictably slanderous report is online here:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=782&printable=1

and the St. Benedict Center’s reply here:

http://www.catholicism.org/trouble-with-truth.html

While I applaud the St. Benedict Center for it’s unflinching opposition to the hateful, anti-Christian racket of Judaism I would urge them to consider avoiding identifying today’s Talmudist/Kabbalist, Zionist, Atheist, Communist, etc., persons of Judaic background as “Jews.” Adherence to these and other ideologies–all of which either turn the Bible upside down or outright reject it–render any spiritual claim to the title “Jew” void. Neither is there any merit to claims that these people are ethnic descendants of Judah or Benjamin or that they have ancestors from Judea.

There is hardly a word more misunderstood and misapplied today, and with such great consequences, than the word “Jew.” I believe that the authors of the articles at the St. Benedict Center website understand the distinctions themselves very well, however, it leaves room for misinterpretation among the lesser informed if the term “Jew” is used for expediency where “Zionist,” “Talmudist” or “Atheist of Judaic background,” for instance, would be clearer. There is so much confusion surrounding the title, “Jew” and so much at stake that we should be doing whatever possible to clarify it whenever possible.

Further, the rabbis teach their followers that the Gentiles hate “The Jews” no matter what they do, so if we criticize “The Jews” without clear distinction we’re validating the rabbis’ paranoid teachings and driving Judaic persons further under their control. Criticisms should be of specific individuals and organizations based upon specific acts of wrongdoing or adherance to the ideology of Judaism and it’s offshoots. These ideologies exist completely independent of any ethnicity. In truth, there is no “Jewish” ethnicity to speak of. Those who today call themselves “Jews” are of Khazar, Arab-Berber, Ethiopian ethnicity, among others, who converted to Judaism long after the destruction of the Temple. With the Temple birth records being destroyed along with the Temple 2000 years ago, only God knows who the true ethnic Jews are today. This tells me that after Christ, Jewish ethnicity is no more relevant to us than animal sacrifice or circumcision.

The reality is that today’s so-called “Jews” are people just like anyone else with no unique mystical identity either good or evil, but with the unfortunate circumstance of having a background in a tyrannical, tribalistic, anti-Biblical ideology which is extremely difficult to break free of. I believe that many would like to leave “the tribe” and the tyranny of the rabbis if they felt assured that we don’t hate all “Jews” as the rabbis claim. Many of these people would be severing familial ties and subjected to hostilities if they broke rank.

Let us be as clear as possible that our opposition is not to “Jews” but to the ideology of Judaism and it’s offshoots and the behavior which those ideologies engender. Consider, also, that the smearmongers exploit the conditioned response of the masses to loathe anything critical of “the Jews.” If they’re in a position of “defending” “the Jews” their work is easy. Better to put them in the position of having to either defend the genocidal racism of the Zohar, for instance, or leave you alone.

Advertisements

SPLC Thought Cops Smeared St. Benedict Center

November 9, 2007

The SPLC’s predictably slanderous report is online here:

http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=782&printable=1

and the St. Benedict Center’s reply here:

http://www.catholicism.org/trouble-with-truth.html

While I applaud the St. Benedict Center for it’s unflinching opposition to the hateful, anti-Christian racket of Judaism I would urge them to consider avoiding identifying today’s Talmudist/Kabbalist, Zionist, Atheist, Communist, etc., persons of Judaic background as “Jews.” Adherence to these and other ideologies–all of which either turn the Bible upside down or outright reject it–render any spiritual claim to the title “Jew” void. Neither is there any merit to claims that these people are ethnic descendants of Judah or Benjamin or that they have ancestors from Judea.

There is hardly a word more misunderstood and misapplied today, and with such great consequences, than the word “Jew.” I believe that the authors of the articles at the St. Benedict Center website understand the distinctions themselves very well, however, it leaves room for misinterpretation among the lesser informed if the term “Jew” is used for expediency where “Zionist,” “Talmudist” or “Atheist of Judaic background,” for instance, would be clearer. There is so much confusion surrounding the title, “Jew” and so much at stake that we should be doing whatever possible to clarify it whenever possible.

Further, the rabbis teach their followers that the Gentiles hate “The Jews” no matter what they do, so if we criticize “The Jews” without clear distinction we’re validating the rabbis’ paranoid teachings and driving Judaic persons further under their control. Criticisms should be of specific individuals and organizations based upon specific acts of wrongdoing or adherance to the ideology of Judaism and it’s offshoots. These ideologies exist completely independent of any ethnicity. In truth, there is no “Jewish” ethnicity to speak of. Those who today call themselves “Jews” are of Khazar, Arab-Berber, Ethiopian ethnicity, among others, who converted to Judaism long after the destruction of the Temple. With the Temple birth records being destroyed along with the Temple 2000 years ago, only God knows who the true ethnic Jews are today. This tells me that after Christ, Jewish ethnicity is no more relevant to us than animal sacrifice or circumcision.

The reality is that today’s so-called “Jews” are people just like anyone else with no unique mystical identity either good or evil, but with the unfortunate circumstance of having a background in a tyrannical, tribalistic, anti-Biblical ideology which is extremely difficult to break free of. I believe that many would like to leave “the tribe” and the tyranny of the rabbis if they felt assured that we don’t hate all “Jews” as the rabbis claim. Many of these people would be severing familial ties and subjected to hostilities if they broke rank.

Let us be as clear as possible that our opposition is not to “Jews” but to the ideology of Judaism and it’s offshoots and the behavior which those ideologies engender. Consider, also, that the smearmongers exploit the conditioned response of the masses to loathe anything critical of “the Jews.” If they’re in a position of “defending” “the Jews” their work is easy. Better to put them in the position of having to either defend the genocidal racism of the Zohar, for instance, or leave you alone.

The Inquisition of John Sharpe

March 13, 2007

Many of you are probably aware of the witch hunt that’s been going on recently which is focused on the traditional Catholic community. Recently the Stalinist outfit, the SPLC has issued a hit piece focused on traditional Catholics. I didn’t find the SPLC botch job worth commenting on here as anyone reading this blog knows to expect such things from them.

What I find to be noteworthy is what appears to be either hopelessly confused individuals or ADL/SPLC plants within the traditional Catholic internet community who’ve been toeing the ADL/SPLC line to such a degree that they make Abe Foxman and Morris Dees seem reasonable, and that’s not an easy thing to do. I don’t intend to mention these individuals by name because they represent a marginal voice struggling for recognition which they do not deserve, so I will not give it to them. I’m also of the opinion that they discredit themselves so incredibly effectively that it would be counterproductive for me to interfere. I trust that the readers of this blog will be able to identify these villains in our midst and alert their friends and family members to their presence.

They’re very easy to identify. If they’re more outraged about offenses to the sensibilities of “the Jews” than they are about attacks against our Lord and the Gospel, that’s one clue. If they focus inordinately on Auschwitz and not very much on Calvary, that’s another clue. If they claim that it’s “antisemitic” to be opposed to the religion of Judaism and the Zionist movement, that’s a strong clue. If they take for granted that Catholics should support the Zionist state, that’s a red flag. If they conflate the Old Testament religion of the faithful Israelites with the anti-Christ tradition of Judaism in their apologetics, that’s a strong indicator. If they insist on associating a direct lineage between the people who today call themselves “Jews” and the Jews of the Bible, that’s cause for suspicion as well. If they make common cause with the rabbis of Judaism, that is a very serious concern which cannot be ignored.

It’s been educational for me to witness these scoundrels and their slanderous, unsubstantiated, Abe Foxman-like attacks on John Sharpe. Their attacks have coincided with the SPLC hit piece on traditional Catholics which also targeted John Sharpe. Due to these efforts and others, Lt. Cmdr. Sharpe, U.S. Navy, has been suspended of his duties pending an investigation into alleged “antisemitic” associations.

So the the Judaic inquisition is apparently operating within traditional Catholicism and in the US military.

Sharpe’s parents have circulated the following letter:

Dear All:

In the interest of defending our son John’s public reputation, we’re writing to ask if you would be willing to assist by writing a letter to the editor of the NAVY TIMES(mailto:navylet@atpco) in response to the article they published on their website last Friday evening (See article below).

Incredibly, the article included a statement from Jim Brantley, a Navy spokesman, clearly stating that John is violating Navy regulations which prohibit “supremacist”
activity: “Evidently he’s affiliated with an anti-Semitic group , and that’s illegal in the U.S. Navy .” Brantley cited Navy Regulation 1167, which states, “No person in the Naval Service shall participate in any organization that espouses supremacist causes.”

Brantley made the leap from mere accusations of anti-Semitism, to (1) it being EVIDENT that John’s associated with an anti-Semitic group . (It certainly is NOT evident; the investigation has hardly begun yet .) And that (2), it being equivalent to “supremacist” activity (says who?) and (3) this is evidence of a violation of Navy Regulations. Brantley’s statement has John guilty of “supremacist activity” without qualification.

We ask that you request that the editor publish a correction of the record and/or a retraction that at least gives John the benefit of the doubt while the investigation is underway.

The other point concerns the NAVY TIMES urging people to “Read what the Southern Poverty Law Center had to say about Sharpe.” Where’s the fairness here? How about a recommendation that people also hear John’s side of the story? Just because the SPLC makes an allegation does that make it fact? This should pointed out to the NAVY TIMES editor.

FYI, and for use or not as you see fit, here’s an example of SPLC’s “unbiased” reporting. In their “Intelligence Report,” which is the basis for the charges against John, (http://www.splcente%20r.org/intel/%20intelreport/%20article.jsp?) they refer to the Neo-CONNED! books published by IHS Press as containing “several articles by racists and anti-Semites.” Of course they don’t identify these articles or their authors. Moreover, they fail to point out that the books contain several articles by well-known Jewish authors such as Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Paul Gottfried, Immanuel Wallerstein, and Jeff Steinberg. So much for balanced reporting.

We appreciate your time and efforts on John’s behalf. And please, a second request, keep him and his family in your prayers.

Thank you and God bless you,
Judith and John
Sharpe

PS Here’s a link to our local newspaper where a similar article ran on the front page Saturday morning. The Virginian-Pilot article is slightly fairer than the NAVY TIMES article, but leaves way too much unreported. If you wish to write to them also, please, be our guest. http://content.%20hamptonroads.%20com/story.%20cfm?story=120893&ran=124140

The Inquisition of John Sharpe

March 13, 2007

Many of you are probably aware of the witch hunt that’s been going on recently which is focused on the traditional Catholic community. Recently the Stalinist outfit, the SPLC has issued a hit piece focused on traditional Catholics. I didn’t find the SPLC botch job worth commenting on here as anyone reading this blog knows to expect such things from them.

What I find to be noteworthy is what appears to be either hopelessly confused individuals or ADL/SPLC plants within the traditional Catholic internet community who’ve been toeing the ADL/SPLC line to such a degree that they make Abe Foxman and Morris Dees seem reasonable, and that’s not an easy thing to do. I don’t intend to mention these individuals by name because they represent a marginal voice struggling for recognition which they do not deserve, so I will not give it to them. I’m also of the opinion that they discredit themselves so incredibly effectively that it would be counterproductive for me to interfere. I trust that the readers of this blog will be able to identify these villains in our midst and alert their friends and family members to their presence.

They’re very easy to identify. If they’re more outraged about offenses to the sensibilities of “the Jews” than they are about attacks against our Lord and the Gospel, that’s one clue. If they focus inordinately on Auschwitz and not very much on Calvary, that’s another clue. If they claim that it’s “antisemitic” to be opposed to the religion of Judaism and the Zionist movement, that’s a strong clue. If they take for granted that Catholics should support the Zionist state, that’s a red flag. If they conflate the Old Testament religion of the faithful Israelites with the anti-Christ tradition of Judaism in their apologetics, that’s a strong indicator. If they insist on associating a direct lineage between the people who today call themselves “Jews” and the Jews of the Bible, that’s cause for suspicion as well. If they make common cause with the rabbis of Judaism, that is a very serious concern which cannot be ignored.

It’s been educational for me to witness these scoundrels and their slanderous, unsubstantiated, Abe Foxman-like attacks on John Sharpe. Their attacks have coincided with the SPLC hit piece on traditional Catholics which also targeted John Sharpe. Due to these efforts and others, Lt. Cmdr. Sharpe, U.S. Navy, has been suspended of his duties pending an investigation into alleged “antisemitic” associations.

So the the Judaic inquisition is apparently operating within traditional Catholicism and in the US military.

Sharpe’s parents have circulated the following letter:

Dear All:

In the interest of defending our son John’s public reputation, we’re writing to ask if you would be willing to assist by writing a letter to the editor of the NAVY TIMES(mailto:navylet@atpco) in response to the article they published on their website last Friday evening (See article below).

Incredibly, the article included a statement from Jim Brantley, a Navy spokesman, clearly stating that John is violating Navy regulations which prohibit “supremacist”
activity: “Evidently he’s affiliated with an anti-Semitic group , and that’s illegal in the U.S. Navy .” Brantley cited Navy Regulation 1167, which states, “No person in the Naval Service shall participate in any organization that espouses supremacist causes.”

Brantley made the leap from mere accusations of anti-Semitism, to (1) it being EVIDENT that John’s associated with an anti-Semitic group . (It certainly is NOT evident; the investigation has hardly begun yet .) And that (2), it being equivalent to “supremacist” activity (says who?) and (3) this is evidence of a violation of Navy Regulations. Brantley’s statement has John guilty of “supremacist activity” without qualification.

We ask that you request that the editor publish a correction of the record and/or a retraction that at least gives John the benefit of the doubt while the investigation is underway.

The other point concerns the NAVY TIMES urging people to “Read what the Southern Poverty Law Center had to say about Sharpe.” Where’s the fairness here? How about a recommendation that people also hear John’s side of the story? Just because the SPLC makes an allegation does that make it fact? This should pointed out to the NAVY TIMES editor.

FYI, and for use or not as you see fit, here’s an example of SPLC’s “unbiased” reporting. In their “Intelligence Report,” which is the basis for the charges against John, (http://www.splcente%20r.org/intel/%20intelreport/%20article.jsp?) they refer to the Neo-CONNED! books published by IHS Press as containing “several articles by racists and anti-Semites.” Of course they don’t identify these articles or their authors. Moreover, they fail to point out that the books contain several articles by well-known Jewish authors such as Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, Paul Gottfried, Immanuel Wallerstein, and Jeff Steinberg. So much for balanced reporting.

We appreciate your time and efforts on John’s behalf. And please, a second request, keep him and his family in your prayers.

Thank you and God bless you,
Judith and John
Sharpe

PS Here’s a link to our local newspaper where a similar article ran on the front page Saturday morning. The Virginian-Pilot article is slightly fairer than the NAVY TIMES article, but leaves way too much unreported. If you wish to write to them also, please, be our guest. http://content.%20hamptonroads.%20com/story.%20cfm?story=120893&ran=124140

Traditional Catholics and Traditional Rabbis mix White with Black

February 22, 2007

From an article titled, “Christophobes at the Gates” written by Christopher Ferrara and published by The Remnant:

…But there are many Jews of good will who oppose this Christophobic campaign. Perhaps the most dramatic example is Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, founder of Toward Tradition. Rabbi Lapin’s public record is full of courageous statements of opposition to the Christophobes …

Lapin is also on congressional record as being an accomplice to Zionist megalobbyist and convicted felon, Jack Abramoff who, among many other crimes, defrauded Native American tribes and used the proceeds to purchase weapons and night vision goggles for Israeli “settlers.”

Lapin and Abramoff had a long history of collaboration together:

WASHINGTON — In September 2000, before he became a target of federal investigations, Jack Abramoff was blazing a trail as a superlobbyist for Seattle-based Preston Gates & Ellis, bringing in millions of dollars in fees and earning a reputation as one of the town’s premier influence traffickers.

So it wasn’t surprising that Abramoff was nominated to join the Cosmos Club, one of Washington’s most selective private clubs. For Abramoff, it was a major honor and yet another avenue to pursue his trade.

But Abramoff worried that his resume wasn’t substantial enough to compete with a membership that includes senior government officials, ambassadors, Nobel Prize winners and business leaders.

The solution, Abramoff decided, was Mercer Island rabbi and Seattle talk-show host Daniel Lapin.

Lapin is far more than a local rabbi. He is a major player in the conservative religious movement, well known for his Toward Tradition, an organization that has a goal of “working to advance our nation toward the traditional Judeo-Christian values.”

It was Lapin who introduced Abramoff to House majority leader Tom DeLay of Texas. Abramoff, in turn, helped Lapin establish Toward Tradition, and he named Lapin’s brother, David, to a position at Eshkol Academy, a now-defunct private school in Columbia, Md., created by Abramoff that promised a high-quality Orthodox Jewish education.

Toward Tradition was just the kind of outfit Abramoff needed.

In an e-mail to Lapin on Sept. 15, 2000, with “HELP!” in the subject line, Abramoff described his dilemma. “Most prospective members have received awards and I have received none,” he wrote.

“I was wondering if you thought it possible that I could put that I have received an award from Toward Tradition with a sufficient academic title, perhaps something like Scholar of Talmudic Studies?”

On Sept. 18, Lapin wrote to Abramoff: “Let’s organize your many prestigious awards so they’re ready to ‘hang on the wall.’ “

That same day, Lapin to Abramoff: “Yes, I just need to know what needs to be produced … letters? Plaques? Neither?”

The next day, Abramoff to Lapin: “Probably just a few clever titles of awards, dates and that’s it. As long as you can be the person to verify them (or we can have someone else verify one and you the other), we should be set. Do you have any creative titles or should I dip into my bag of tricks?”

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/229692_lapin23.html

This is who The Remnant tells us is a “Jew of good will.” One wonders, what does it take to be considered a “Jew” of bad will in The Remnant’s estimation? It’s not enough that Rabbi Lapin is a Zionist of the most extreme bent; that he’s an upholder of the anti-Christ Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions; that he’s a rabbinic infiltrator of Christian circles; that he was an accomplice to a convicted felon and agent of the Zionist state?

The Remnant’s article continues:

Lapin is “a strong supporter of Pope Pius XII as a righteous gentile, a term he believes should be renamed ‘righteous Christian.’”

Since when has the opinion of a rabbi of the Talmud and Kabbalah been a gauge of any value whatever pertaining to Catholic matters? Who cares what Rabbi Lapin thinks about Pius XII? The entire Pius XII issue is a complete resource drainer like so much other nonsense occupying the minds of traditional Catholics today. And to be considered a “righteous gentile” (see:Noahide) by a rabbi is no Christian virtue. But here is The Remnant passing that rabbinic notion with their endorsement along to their readers.

The Remnant article goes on:

He has “lamented that the Holocaust Memorial Museum presents anti-Christian propaganda…”

Of course he has. It’s precisely this way that Lapin has built inroads into the Christian camp. The attacks of the SPLC, The Holocaust Memorial Museum, the ADL, et al, have made it possible for Lapin to do so. Meanwhile the liberal rabbis continue their attack from without as he and his fellow infiltrating rabbis work from within, now aided by The Remnant.

But has Rabbi Lapin lamented the fact that the Holocaust Memorial Museum is in essence a U.S. taxpayer funded yeshiva for the new state religion of Holocaustolatry? Is he lobbying for the creation of an equal number of museums dedicated to the memory of the millions of Christians holocausted by the Judaic Bolsheviks? No? Then how is it that this blatant upholder of the rabbinic double standard has been baptised a “Jew of good will” by The Remnant? Who’s interest does The Remnant serve here?

More from The Remnant’s article:

Lapin has warned that “the biggest danger to the Jewish people is not Christianity but secular liberalism.”

Of course Lapin says that. He’s a Kabbalist playing the right pillar against the left for God’s sake. THAT’S WHAT KABBALISTS DO.

And the gutless, toothless, suicidal “Christianity” of our time–where “traditionalist” Catholics join forces with traditionalist rabbis in “restoring Christian society” (could there be a more insane notion?)–poses no threat to Lapin or his fellow rabbis to speak of. “Christians” today are the rabbis’ golem. Look how prepared they are to go kill the rabbis’ enemies in the Middle East. Look how they welcome the rabbis into their camp and praise them with glowing endorsements. The rabbis could never generate such valuable advertisement for themselves and their tradition as The Remnant has.

I could go on and on, but what’s the use? The truth about the anti-Christ and anti-Christian nature of the rabbis and their tradition of trickery and double standards is available to anyone able to read in the work of Johannes Andreas Eisenmenger, Johan Buxtorf and Rev. Pranaitis from centuries ago and modern scholars, Michael A. Hoffman and Craig Heimbichner. Those who haven’t fallen into the state of disorientation which the author of the Remnant article apparently has will understand the matter clearly and shun the rabbis and their Kabbalistic pillar-play in keeping with the true Christian tradition. The rest I leave in God’s hands. I harbor no illusions of being able to penetrate the hypnosis they labor under.

Traditional Catholics and Traditional Rabbis mix White with Black

February 22, 2007

From an article titled, “Christophobes at the Gates” written by Christopher Ferrara and published by The Remnant:

…But there are many Jews of good will who oppose this Christophobic campaign. Perhaps the most dramatic example is Orthodox Rabbi Daniel Lapin, founder of Toward Tradition. Rabbi Lapin’s public record is full of courageous statements of opposition to the Christophobes …

Lapin is also on congressional record as being an accomplice to Zionist megalobbyist and convicted felon, Jack Abramoff who, among many other crimes, defrauded Native American tribes and used the proceeds to purchase weapons and night vision goggles for Israeli “settlers.”

Lapin and Abramoff had a long history of collaboration together:

WASHINGTON — In September 2000, before he became a target of federal investigations, Jack Abramoff was blazing a trail as a superlobbyist for Seattle-based Preston Gates & Ellis, bringing in millions of dollars in fees and earning a reputation as one of the town’s premier influence traffickers.

So it wasn’t surprising that Abramoff was nominated to join the Cosmos Club, one of Washington’s most selective private clubs. For Abramoff, it was a major honor and yet another avenue to pursue his trade.

But Abramoff worried that his resume wasn’t substantial enough to compete with a membership that includes senior government officials, ambassadors, Nobel Prize winners and business leaders.

The solution, Abramoff decided, was Mercer Island rabbi and Seattle talk-show host Daniel Lapin.

Lapin is far more than a local rabbi. He is a major player in the conservative religious movement, well known for his Toward Tradition, an organization that has a goal of “working to advance our nation toward the traditional Judeo-Christian values.”

It was Lapin who introduced Abramoff to House majority leader Tom DeLay of Texas. Abramoff, in turn, helped Lapin establish Toward Tradition, and he named Lapin’s brother, David, to a position at Eshkol Academy, a now-defunct private school in Columbia, Md., created by Abramoff that promised a high-quality Orthodox Jewish education.

Toward Tradition was just the kind of outfit Abramoff needed.

In an e-mail to Lapin on Sept. 15, 2000, with “HELP!” in the subject line, Abramoff described his dilemma. “Most prospective members have received awards and I have received none,” he wrote.

“I was wondering if you thought it possible that I could put that I have received an award from Toward Tradition with a sufficient academic title, perhaps something like Scholar of Talmudic Studies?”

On Sept. 18, Lapin wrote to Abramoff: “Let’s organize your many prestigious awards so they’re ready to ‘hang on the wall.’ “

That same day, Lapin to Abramoff: “Yes, I just need to know what needs to be produced … letters? Plaques? Neither?”

The next day, Abramoff to Lapin: “Probably just a few clever titles of awards, dates and that’s it. As long as you can be the person to verify them (or we can have someone else verify one and you the other), we should be set. Do you have any creative titles or should I dip into my bag of tricks?”

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/229692_lapin23.html

This is who The Remnant tells us is a “Jew of good will.” One wonders, what does it take to be considered a “Jew” of bad will in The Remnant’s estimation? It’s not enough that Rabbi Lapin is a Zionist of the most extreme bent; that he’s an upholder of the anti-Christ Talmudic and Kabbalistic traditions; that he’s a rabbinic infiltrator of Christian circles; that he was an accomplice to a convicted felon and agent of the Zionist state?

The Remnant’s article continues:

Lapin is “a strong supporter of Pope Pius XII as a righteous gentile, a term he believes should be renamed ‘righteous Christian.’”

Since when has the opinion of a rabbi of the Talmud and Kabbalah been a gauge of any value whatever pertaining to Catholic matters? Who cares what Rabbi Lapin thinks about Pius XII? The entire Pius XII issue is a complete resource drainer like so much other nonsense occupying the minds of traditional Catholics today. And to be considered a “righteous gentile” (see:Noahide) by a rabbi is no Christian virtue. But here is The Remnant passing that rabbinic notion with their endorsement along to their readers.

The Remnant article goes on:

He has “lamented that the Holocaust Memorial Museum presents anti-Christian propaganda…”

Of course he has. It’s precisely this way that Lapin has built inroads into the Christian camp. The attacks of the SPLC, The Holocaust Memorial Museum, the ADL, et al, have made it possible for Lapin to do so. Meanwhile the liberal rabbis continue their attack from without as he and his fellow infiltrating rabbis work from within, now aided by The Remnant.

But has Rabbi Lapin lamented the fact that the Holocaust Memorial Museum is in essence a U.S. taxpayer funded yeshiva for the new state religion of Holocaustolatry? Is he lobbying for the creation of an equal number of museums dedicated to the memory of the millions of Christians holocausted by the Judaic Bolsheviks? No? Then how is it that this blatant upholder of the rabbinic double standard has been baptised a “Jew of good will” by The Remnant? Whose interest does The Remnant serve here?

More from The Remnant’s article:

Lapin has warned that “the biggest danger to the Jewish people is not Christianity but secular liberalism.”

Of course Lapin says that. He’s a Kabbalist playing the right pillar against the left for God’s sake. THAT’S WHAT KABBALISTS DO.

And the gutless, toothless, suicidal “Christianity” of our time–where “traditionalist” Catholics join forces with traditionalist rabbis in “restoring Christian society” (could there be a more insane notion?)–poses no threat to Lapin or his fellow rabbis to speak of. “Christians” today are the rabbis’ golem. Look how prepared they are to go kill the rabbis’ enemies in the Middle East. Look how they welcome the rabbis into their camp and praise them with glowing endorsements. The rabbis could never generate such valuable advertisement for themselves and their tradition as The Remnant has.

I could go on and on, but what’s the use? The truth about the anti-Christ and anti-Christian nature of the rabbis and their tradition of trickery and double standards is available to anyone able to read in the work of Johannes Andreas Eisenmenger, Johan Buxtorf and Rev. Pranaitis from centuries ago and modern scholars, Michael A. Hoffman and Craig Heimbichner. Those who haven’t fallen into the state of disorientation which the author of the Remnant article apparently has will understand the matter clearly and shun the rabbis and their Kabbalistic pillar-play in keeping with the true Christian tradition. The rest I leave in God’s hands. I harbor no illusions of being able to penetrate the hypnosis they labor under.