Archive for the ‘Reconciliation’ Category

Vatican ‘Jew’ Enforces Vatican II

May 4, 2012
This should be read in tandem with: Opus Pharisaei

“One must take this occasion to express the deep hope that leniency will be denied” to anyone who does not accept the [Second Vatican] council’s teaching and “that there will be no being content with fake, quasi-adhesions accompanied by evident verbal and mental reservations to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council in general and to ‘Nostra Aetate’ in particular.”

Last year we noted that the Israeli tribalist Fr. David Jaeger was installed as a prelate auditor of the Roman Rota, the highest court of the Catholic Church. We noted Jaeger’s candid admission that at the Vatican court he would be as loyal to the people of Counterfeit Israel and the nation of Counterfeit Israel as any other Israeli working for a supranational body, mentioning the interesting example of Israelis working at the International Monetary Fund as a reference as to how his tribal loyalty would manifest itself as he works at the Vatican’s highest court. We appreciate the candor because it reveals the farce of the court historian portrayal of the court ‘Jew’ as a turncoat and lays bare the previously well hidden reality.

Jaeger was a key figure in the Vatican’s official recognition of Counterfeit Israel of 1993, a typically raw deal where the gangster state was afforded undeserved credibility by the venerable 2000 year-old Church institution and Catholics got nothing except spat upon. This can only last so long, however. Whatever residual credibility the Vatican may be coasting on presently that was not lost in the pedophilia scandal is being squandered entirely in the massive Zionist vortex of consumption.

Jaeger’s suggestion that without Vatican II and Nostra Aetate ‘The Jews’ are in danger of annihilation by violent mobs of ‘non-Jews’ fueled by Christian theological hatred of ‘Jews’ is itself a form of hatred of the historical Church and the Christian people; a blood libel. Always the double standard. And Jaeger’s appeals to victimhood as he sits at the head of the Vatican’s highest court inciting an inquisition against Catholics strains chutzpah beyond most previous wild examples.

Jeager’s work, like that of the misnamed ‘Opus Dei,’ is the relativisation away of the the Church’s past authoritative teachings and making an absolute out of a  document lobbied for by haters of the Church and the Gospel--Jules Isaac, B’nai B’rith, AJC, WJC, etc., etc,–and co-written by a rabbi who admitted that he wanted to attack Christians’ souls.

Church should not accept members who deny Vatican II, official says

ROME (CNS) — The Second Vatican Council’s teaching, particularly on Judaism and other religions, is rooted in traditional Christian theology and the Bible, and the Catholic Church should not offer concessions to those who do not accept its teaching, said an Israeli-born Franciscan who serves as a judge on a top Vatican court.

Msgr. David Jaeger, a judge at the Roman Rota, defined as worrying a tendency, “here and there in Catholicism, to look leniently upon stray groups that are marginal but well-publicized who denounce the doctrine of the council, including the declaration ‘Nostra Aetate'” on the relationship of the church to non-Christian religions.

Msgr. Jaeger, who grew up in a Jewish family, spoke about “Nostra Aetate” during a conference on the Second Vatican Council at Rome’s Opus Dei-run Holy Cross University May 3-4.

“While often presented as if it were absolutely new,” he said, the teaching of “Nostra Aetate” “perfectly corresponds to the most ancient intuitions of Christian theology” when it affirms “there can be, and in particular cases, are elements of truth and holiness” in other religions, he said. In addition, the document emphasized that Judaism [the religion which teaches Jesus got what he deserved at Calvary] has a special status, which “already was extensively explained by St. Paul, particularly in the Epistle to the Romans” [a ridiculous falsehood. St. Paul addresses a remnant of Israelites, not the Pharisaic religion of Judaism that revels in responsibility for Jesus’ execution].

The council’s document explained the church’s “doctrine on Judaism, the only religion which, while not knowing Christ, has its origins in biblical revelation, which is why the church does not regard it simply as a ‘non-Christian religion,’ but ascribes to it a unique status,” Msgr. Jaeger said [falsely. Judaism has its origins in the Pharisees and the Mishnah and their making the Bible of no effect].

While recognizing the unique and special relationship between God and the Jewish people, he said, the council did not say say that Judaism was a “parallel path to salvation” and it did not deny that somehow, in the end, all salvation would be accomplished through Christ.

Obviously motivated by the horrors of the Holocaust, but also by centuries of injustices and persecution of Jews “by those who called themselves Christians and believed they therefore could justify their brutality, the declaration took care to severely condemn such conduct and to highlight the complete illegitimacy of supporting it with any reference to Christianity,” he said.

“The proof of Nostra Aetate’s effectiveness is that it seems strange to have to say it today,” the monsignor said.

However, he said, “One must take this occasion to express the deep hope that leniency will be denied” to anyone who does not accept the council’s teaching and “that there will be no being content with fake, quasi-adhesions accompanied by evident verbal and mental reservations to the teaching of the Second Vatican Council in general and to ‘Nostra Aetate’ in particular.”

“In fact,” he said, “the extreme gravity of the counter-witness of those who have, for centuries, abused the name of Christ and the term Christian to persecute and oppress the Jews must never be forgotten or underestimated in any way.”

http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1201832.htm 

Also see:

Opus Pharisaei

On Bishop Williamson’s Second Apology

February 27, 2009

Bishop Williamson has apologized again, inappropriately in my view, for the shock and awe campaign that has come as a response to his public expression of his thoughts on certain elements of “Holocaust” doctrine. In fact, the responsibility for the calamitous, altogether disconnected and disproportionate reaction of this past month lies squarely on the rabbis and Judaic power-brokers and their accomplices in governments, in the media, in the curia and in the parishes directly involved in it; a reaction which has all of the proportion and justice of the December 2008 Gaza massacre. I disagree with the suggestion that a few words spoken by the Bishop are the cause of all this. Let’s not validate the absurd notion that lynch-mob behavior is a normal or acceptable, inevitable response to controversy and that Catholics must tailor their words, nay, their thoughts, to forestall it.

What is most disconcerting about Bp. Williamson’s apology, however, is the closing line: “As the Holy Father has said, every act of unjust violence against one man hurts all mankind.” HERE

This is a clear reference to Benedict’s shameful Holocaust sermon of January 28th, 2008 where he proclaimed, “May the Shoah be for all a warning against forgetfulness, against denial or reductionism, because the violence against a single human being is violence against all.” HERE

I don’t care to speculate on the motivations behind Bp. Williamson’s adoption of Bendict’s foreign language from his recent “Holocaust” sermon [see footnote]. I am also bewildered by Bishop Fellay’s reported adoption of the “elder brothers” language on the lips of every crypto-rabbi in Rome today. This is not consistent with the SSPX message which has it that the society intends to bring Rome to Tradition. These statements, if taken at face value, indicate a new synthesis produced by this recent “Holocaust” debacle sending the SSPX off its stated course considerably.

If the price of admission into dialog with Rome on the errors of the Vatican II Council is adopting Rome’s strange language and ideas concerning the “elder brothers” it would seem to be a case of straining out a gnat while swallowing a camel in my estimation–not worth it; a deal the Archbishop would have scoffed at.

I warn that the rabbis would not be satisfied, nor do I believe that Rome would grant “full communion,” until “Rabbi Larry” and his cronies are preaching Holocaustolatry in SSPX schools and seminaries as they already do in Novus Ordo schools and seminaries HERE. Apologies from “Holocaust deniers” (who the rabbis, madmen that they are, place on par with the perpetrators of “The Holocaust”) are inconsequential. There is no forgiveness for them. The only acceptable reparation is that they be imprisoned, cast out, or otherwise silenced, but more importantly, that their followers subsequently be mindbombed with Holocaust dogma. Benedict’s elder brother, Rabbi Arthur Schneier proclaimed as much at the Vatican last week:

“… how can we but revolt at Holocaust-denial? Victims of the Holocaust have not given us the right to forgive the perpetrators nor the Holocaust deniers … we must transmit “never again” through Holocaust education to future generations …”

Pope and Pharisees Preach More Holocaustolatry

A spokesperson for Yad Vashem has stated the same in response to Bishop Williamson’s apology:

“The millions of Jews that were murdered in the Holocaust and the survivors who were persecuted are not waiting for [Bp. Williamson’s] apology,” said Iris Rosenberg, spokeswoman of the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum in Jerusalem. “If he is looking to repent, he needs to admit that he was wrong in denying the truth. This is much more important to the people he claims to lead.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090226/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_holocaust_denial

What is important to Yad Vashem is not an apology from Bishop Williamson, but conforming the minds of his followers to “Holocaust” dogma, and Yad Vashem has many accomplices in Rome who have already made “Holocaust” dogma standard curriculum in Novus Ordo Catholic schools and seminaries. A true traditional Catholic alternative to their kosher schools and seminaries is not acceptable to them.

Have no doubt, as the Vatican currently stands, this is what “full communion” entails.

My prayers are with the SSPX leadership. I cannot imagine the pressure that’s upon them.

Footnote: Benedict stated, “violence committed against any one single human being is violence against all humanity. No man is an island, a well known poet once wrote.” That poet is Anglican priest, John Donne who was steeped in the Pantheism, Hermeticism, and Kabbalism of the Renaissance, but the concept Benedict draws on is actually founded in Babylonian Talmud, tractate Sanhedrin 37a and applies only to “Jews:” “Whosoever destroys a single soul of Israel, scripture imputes [guilt] to him as if he had destroyed a complete world.” Contrary to what Talmud suggests, this idea is not found in biblical Scripture.

On Bishop Williamson’s Second Apology

February 27, 2009

Bishop Williamson has apologized again, inappropriately in my view, for the shock and awe campaign that has come as a response to his public expression of his thoughts on certain elements of “Holocaust” doctrine. In fact, the responsibility for the calamitous, altogether disconnected and disproportionate reaction of this past month lies squarely on the rabbis and Judaic power-brokers and their accomplices in governments, in the media, in the curia and in the parishes directly involved in it; a reaction which has all of the proportion and justice of the December 2008 Gaza massacre. I disagree with the suggestion that a few words spoken by the Bishop are the cause of all this. Let’s not validate the absurd notion that lynch-mob behavior is a normal or acceptable, inevitable response to controversy and that Catholics must tailor their words, nay, their thoughts, to forestall it.

What is most disconcerting about Bp. Williamson’s apology, however, is the closing line: “As the Holy Father has said, every act of unjust violence against one man hurts all mankind.” HERE

This is a clear reference to Benedict’s shameful Holocaust sermon of January 28th, 2008 where he proclaimed, “May the Shoah be for all a warning against forgetfulness, against denial or reductionism, because the violence against a single human being is violence against all.” HERE

I don’t care to speculate on the motivations behind Bp. Williamson’s adoption of Bendict’s foreign language from his recent “Holocaust” sermon [see footnote]. I am also bewildered by Bishop Fellay’s reported adoption of the “elder brothers” language on the lips of every crypto-rabbi in Rome today. This is not consistent with the SSPX message which has it that the society intends to bring Rome to Tradition. These statements, if taken at face value, indicate a new synthesis produced by this recent “Holocaust” debacle sending the SSPX off its stated course considerably.

If the price of admission into dialog with Rome on the errors of the Vatican II Council is adopting Rome’s strange language and ideas concerning the “elder brothers” it would seem to be a case of straining out a gnat while swallowing a camel in my estimation–not worth it; a deal the Archbishop would have scoffed at.

I warn that the rabbis would not be satisfied, nor do I believe that Rome would grant “full communion,” until “Rabbi Larry” and his cronies are preaching Holocaustolatry in SSPX schools and seminaries as they already do in Novus Ordo schools and seminaries HERE. Apologies from “Holocaust deniers” (who the rabbis, madmen that they are, place on par with the perpetrators of “The Holocaust”) are inconsequential. There is no forgiveness for them. The only acceptable reparation is that they be imprisoned, cast out, or otherwise silenced, but more importantly, that their followers subsequently be mindbombed with Holocaust dogma. Benedict’s elder brother, Rabbi Arthur Schneier proclaimed as much at the Vatican last week:

“… how can we but revolt at Holocaust-denial? Victims of the Holocaust have not given us the right to forgive the perpetrators nor the Holocaust deniers … we must transmit “never again” through Holocaust education to future generations …”

Pope and Pharisees Preach More Holocaustolatry

A spokesperson for Yad Vashem has stated the same in response to Bishop Williamson’s apology:

“The millions of Jews that were murdered in the Holocaust and the survivors who were persecuted are not waiting for [Bp. Williamson’s] apology,” said Iris Rosenberg, spokeswoman of the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum in Jerusalem. “If he is looking to repent, he needs to admit that he was wrong in denying the truth. This is much more important to the people he claims to lead.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090226/ap_on_re_eu/eu_italy_holocaust_denial

What is important to Yad Vashem is not an apology from Bishop Williamson, but conforming the minds of his followers to “Holocaust” dogma, and Yad Vashem has many accomplices in Rome who have already made “Holocaust” dogma standard curriculum in Novus Ordo Catholic schools and seminaries. A true traditional Catholic alternative to their kosher schools and seminaries is not acceptable to them.

Have no doubt, as the Vatican currently stands, this is what “full communion” entails.

My prayers are with the SSPX leadership. I cannot imagine the pressure that’s upon them.

Footnote: Benedict stated, “violence committed against any one single human being is violence against all humanity. No man is an island, a well known poet once wrote.” That poet is Anglican priest, John Donne who was steeped in the Pantheism, Hermeticism, and Kabbalism of the Renaissance, but the concept Benedict draws on is actually founded in Babylonian Talmud, tractate Sanhedrin 37a and applies only to “Jews:” “Whosoever destroys a single soul of Israel, scripture imputes [guilt] to him as if he had destroyed a complete world.” Contrary to what Talmud suggests, this idea is not found in biblical Scripture.

St. Vincent Ferrer

April 6, 2008

St. Vincent Ferrer’s feast day is April 5. As one of the Church’s greatest missionaries he converted tens of thousands of Sephardic Judaics from vain Talmudic and Kabbalistic self-worship to salvation in Jesus Christ. He knew nothing of “dialogue” and “reconciliation” with “elder brothers,” theological schemes which put off missions to the Khazars and Sephardim instead waiting for an end-times mass conversion, or Cardinal Schönborn’s latest–the idea that Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to Jews:

Judaism’s way to salvation, by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn

I take it that Schönborn would have us believe Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to the Khazar and Sephardi nations–today’s “Jews”–by virtue of their future conversion to the anti-Christ Talmud. How else can these strange theological inventions be understood?

St. Vincent Ferrer

April 6, 2008

St. Vincent Ferrer’s feast day is April 5. As one of the Church’s greatest missionaries he converted tens of thousands of Sephardic Judaics from vain Talmudic and Kabbalistic self-worship to salvation in Jesus Christ. He knew nothing of “dialogue” and “reconciliation” with “elder brothers,” theological schemes which put off missions to the Khazars and Sephardim instead waiting for an end-times mass conversion, or Cardinal Schönborn’s latest–the idea that Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to Jews:

Judaism’s way to salvation, by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn

I take it that Schönborn would have us believe Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to the Khazar and Sephardi nations–today’s “Jews”–by virtue of their future conversion to the anti-Christ Talmud. How else can these strange theological inventions be understood?

St. Vincent Ferrer

April 6, 2008

St. Vincent Ferrer’s feast day is April 5. As one of the Church’s greatest missionaries he converted tens of thousands of Sephardic Judaics from vain Talmudic and Kabbalistic self-worship to salvation in Jesus Christ. He knew nothing of “dialogue” and “reconciliation” with “elder brothers,” theological schemes which put off missions to the Khazars and Sephardim instead waiting for an end-times mass conversion, or Cardinal Schönborn’s latest–the idea that Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to Jews:

Judaism’s way to salvation, by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn

I take it that Schönborn would have us believe Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to the Khazar and Sephardi nations–today’s “Jews”–by virtue of their future conversion to the anti-Christ Talmud. How else can these strange theological inventions be understood?

St. Vincent Ferrer

April 6, 2008

St. Vincent Ferrer’s feast day is April 5. As one of the Church’s greatest missionaries he converted tens of thousands of Sephardic Judaics from vain Talmudic and Kabbalistic self-worship to salvation in Jesus Christ. He knew nothing of “dialogue” and “reconciliation” with “elder brothers,” theological schemes which put off missions to the Khazars and Sephardim instead waiting for an end-times mass conversion, or Cardinal Schönborn’s latest–the idea that Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to Jews:

Judaism’s way to salvation, by Cardinal Christoph Schönborn

I take it that Schönborn would have us believe Christ’s great commission to preach to all nations did not apply to the Khazar and Sephardi nations–today’s “Jews”–by virtue of their future conversion to the anti-Christ Talmud. How else can these strange theological inventions be understood?

"Elder Brother" Rabbi Eliyahu: "One yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs"

April 4, 2008

“Elder Brother” and former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of “Israel” Mordechai Eliyahu explains proportion as the Talmud has it:

“Even when we seek revenge, it is important to make one thing clear – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs.

“The Talmud states that if gentiles rob Israel of silver they will pay it back in gold, and all that is taken will be paid back in folds, but in cases like these there is nothing to pay back, since as I said – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs.” (“Rabbi Eliyahu: Life of one yeshiva boy worth more than 1,000 Arabs,” Kobi Nahshoni, Ynet, April 3, 2008)

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3527410,00.html

An eye for an eye? The rabbis have no use for that Biblical stuff. That’s what the Old Testament says. It’s the Talmud that the rabbis draw their racist, genocidal teachings lacking any sense of proportion from, as Rabbi Eliyahu demonstrates so clearly.

This is the religion of the “elder brothers in the faith” whom Benedict says Christians must be “reconciled” with. What he is attempting to bring about can only be seen as a diabolical conjunction of opposites.

"Elder Brother" Rabbi Eliyahu: "One yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs"

April 4, 2008

“Elder Brother” and former Sephardic Chief Rabbi of “Israel” Mordechai Eliyahu explains proportion as the Talmud has it:

“Even when we seek revenge, it is important to make one thing clear – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs.

“The Talmud states that if gentiles rob Israel of silver they will pay it back in gold, and all that is taken will be paid back in folds, but in cases like these there is nothing to pay back, since as I said – the life of one yeshiva boy is worth more than the lives of 1,000 Arabs.” (“Rabbi Eliyahu: Life of one yeshiva boy worth more than 1,000 Arabs,” Kobi Nahshoni, Ynet, April 3, 2008)

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3527410,00.html

An eye for an eye? The rabbis have no use for that Biblical stuff. That’s what the Old Testament says. It’s the Talmud that the rabbis draw their racist, genocidal teachings lacking any sense of proportion from, as Rabbi Eliyahu demonstrates so clearly.

This is the religion of the “elder brothers in the faith” whom Benedict says Christians must be “reconciled” with. What he is attempting to bring about can only be seen as a diabolical conjunction of opposites.

The Crucifixion Narrative for Goys vs. the Crucifixion Narrative Which the Rabbis Maintain Amongst Themselves

March 20, 2008

In the depictions of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ intended for Goys, the Romans and Pilate are made to be responsible, but among themselves Orthodox “Jews” fully take responsibility for the Crucifixion, even exonerating the Romans completely.

Compare the BBC mockery of the Gospel titled “The Passion” with the Talmudic account of the Crucifixion:

The Crucifixion story for Goys:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/showbiz/showbiznews.html?in_article_id=535748&in_page_id=1773

The Crucifixion account which the rabbis maintain amongst themselves:

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/wire1.html

Far from being an esoteric teaching of rabbinic Judaism, the willing acceptance for responsibility for the Crucifixion of Jesus is openly manifested in times and places where Orthodox Judaic persons have dominance. It is not uncommon to hear differing variations of the insulting threat, “Take your Jesus down from the cross and we’ll crucify him again,” or, “If Jesus comes back we’ll kill him again,” or, “We killed Jesus and we’ll kill you too.”

Evidence of this hateful tradition can be seen at the links below:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/we-killed-jesus-and-well-kill-you-too.html

Also see:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/effects-of-alcohol-and-judaism.html

A fine basis for “reconciliation,” no?