Archive for the ‘Pantheism’ Category

‘Shoah’ Theologian Reveals Hermetic/Kabbalistic Doctrine at Core of Holocaustolatry

November 18, 2009

Man is liberated by God – God is liberated by Man: so says ‘Shoah’ theologian, Fr. John Pawlikowski in agreement with ‘Holocaust’ high priest, Elie Wiesel.

… the Holocaust and our contemporary evolutionary consciousness force upon us a major reformulation of our understanding of divine and human agency. In speaking of the need to rediscover a compelling God as the ground of post-Holocaust ethics, I believe I am close to the stage Elie Wiesel has reached as he has probed the depth of the Holocaust these many years … Wiesel hints that after all is said and done, the Holocaust may reveal that divine and human liberation are very much intertwined, and that, despite continuing tension, both God and humanity yearn for each other as a result. In consequence of this linkage, Wiesel is prepared to say that human acts of justice and compassion help to liberate God, to restore the divine image as Fackenheim has put it … (Fr. John Pawlikowski, “Thinking About God After Auschwitz,” Good and Evil After Auschwitz, pp 62-63)

http://books.google.com/books?id=H_ZLRVENLSkC&pg=PP1&dq=Good+and+evil+after+Auschwitz#v=onepage&q=&f=false

And while Emil Fackenheim may have said that human acts “restore the divine image” it was the rabbis of Judaism who first concocted that pantheist concept, Tikkun HaPanim (‘repairing the face’ of God).

Also see:

Rabbi Pulls Back the Veil on Judaism’s Paganism

and:

Judaism Discovered pg. 785

And note Fr. John Pawlikowski’s recent 11/11 ‘Holocaust’ ‘dialogue’ with fellow ‘Shoah” theologian Rabbi Irving “Yitz” Greenberg at a formerly Catholic college:

The college [of St. Elizabeth’s Holocaust Remembrance] observance will continue at 7:30 p.m. Wednesday, Nov. 11, again in the Dolan Performance Hall, where three internationally known theologians, Rabbi Irving “Yitz” Greenberg, the Rev. John Pawlikowski and the Rev. Henry “Hank” F. Knight, will discuss “Challenges and Opportunities in the Jewish-Christian Dialogue.” The event is free and open to the public. (Madison Eagle, Nov 6th)

http://www.recordernewspapers.com/articles/2009/11/06/madison_eagle/news/doc4af20f153698a907646925.txt

Advertisements

Pope Leads Philosophy Students to the Hasidic "Wisdom" of Martin Buber

November 17, 2008

Martin Buber and the Struggle of Faith

I have no doubt that this testimonial reflects the zeitgeist in most nominally Catholic universities.

Pope Leads Philosophy Students to the Hasidic "Wisdom" of Martin Buber

November 17, 2008

Martin Buber and the Struggle of Faith

I have no doubt that this testimonial reflects the zeitgeist in most nominally Catholic universities.

"The God Squad" Lies About Judaism and Pantheism

December 31, 2007

“… the principal teaching of the Wiccan religion is that we are one with the universe. The foundational teaching of all three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) is that the universe is a creation of God, not a part of God.” (Rabbi Marc Gellman & Msgr. Thomas Hartman, The God Squad, December 29, 2007)

In fact, Wicca is informed by the pantheistic tradition of Masonry (through Gerald Gardner and Aliester Crowley) and Masonry is informed by rabbinic Judaism with heavy emphasis on the pantheistic kabbalistic tradition.

The “God Squad” is simply repeating the cover story intended for the Goys: “Judaism is the religion of the Bible; a strict monotheistic religion which Christianity has ‘sprung from’.”

Utter nonsense.

"The God Squad" Lies About Judaism and Pantheism

December 31, 2007

“… the principal teaching of the Wiccan religion is that we are one with the universe. The foundational teaching of all three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) is that the universe is a creation of God, not a part of God.” (Rabbi Marc Gellman & Msgr. Thomas Hartman, The God Squad, December 29, 2007)

In fact, Wicca is informed by the pantheistic tradition of Masonry (through Gerald Gardner and Aliester Crowley) and Masonry is informed by rabbinic Judaism with heavy emphasis on the pantheistic kabbalistic tradition.

The “God Squad” is simply repeating the cover story intended for the Goys: “Judaism is the religion of the Bible; a strict monotheistic religion which Christianity has ‘sprung from’.”

Utter nonsense.

Walter Kasper’s Mentor: Hassidic Philosopher, Martin Buber

February 28, 2007

“I mention here only the [name] of … Martin Buber, from whom as a young student I learnt so much …” (Walter Cardinal Kasper)

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/card-kasper-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20011123_kasper-jews-christians_en.html

Can Hassidic philosopher, Martin Buber be credited as one of the teachers of the philosophical error of immanentism to the generation of immanentists currently populating Rome?

What is well known is Buber’s racist, pantheist (rebadged “panentheist” by him) understanding of Shekinah which he associated with physical “Israel” (i.e. “the Jews”). It would come as no surprise then that Kasper, after having been properly mentored in Judaic self-worship, would turn out to be one of the most valuable Judaic assets in the Vatican working in his capacity as President of the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.

Religious relations with “the Jews” have been on the up since Kasper’s appointment as any Catholic schoolchild can tell you after being lectured on the horrible nature of the Christian “teaching of contempt” (see: the Gospel) by an ADL rabbi, an ADL indoctrinated school teacher or through Catholic school teaching material produced by Judaic bankers documented here:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/01/judaics-preach-guilt-in-catholic.html

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/judaic-lawyerbanker-altering-curriculum.html

Kasper has spoken about Buber’s synthesis of “interfaith dialogue” which has proven so disastrous for Christianity:

“Dialogue” is a relatively new concept in philosophy and in theology as well. It has its roots in the personalistic philosophy of the first half of the 20th century, especially in the Jewish personalistic philosophy of Martin Buber, Franz Rosenzweig, Emanuel Levinas and others. (Walter Kasper, Communion Through Dialogue)

Kasper speaks lovingly of Buber’s diabolical “dialogical thinking”–change synthesized through dialogue–which is simply Hegelian dialectics by another name:

As Martin Buber, one of the most significant representatives of dialogical thinking, says, the truth is located not only in direct subject-object relations but in a “dia”, a “between” which is opened up between the dialogue partners and in which both have a share. Only in the “dia”, the between of a I-thou and a We-relation, do we “have” or, better, do we participate in the objective reality; the subject-object-reality is thus embedded in the subject-subject reality of communication and dialogue. (Walter Kasper, Communion Through Dialogue)

http://www.cmswr.org/nationalassembly/keynotespeaker.htm

With sublime Hassidic philosophical “truths” such as the above en vogue in Rome, it’s no wonder that there’s no longer any place for the clunky old thinking of St. Thomas.

How many of you knew how great the influence the thinking of Hassidic philospher, Martin Buber has been in the disastrous course the Vatican has taken in recent decades?

With that thought in mind, I have two questions for the writers and editors of Latin Mass magazine. I’ve seen that a series of articles has started in the recent edition of Latin Mass on the topic of the philosophical error of immanentism, the first article curiously citing virtually unknown “Hebrew Catholic,” Ronda Chervin as an authority for the Catholic side alongside St. Thomas, Pope St. Pius X and documents from the First Vatican Council.

Will the Judaic component of the subversion of Catholic thinking be addressed as it has been here, or will it continue to be studiously avoided as it traditionally has been in the past by Latin Mass magazine?

If it is the latter, who benefits from that arrangement?

Walter Kasper’s Mentor: Hassidic Philosopher, Martin Buber

February 28, 2007

“I mention here only the [name] of … Martin Buber, from whom as a young student I learnt so much …” (Walter Cardinal Kasper)

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/card-kasper-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20011123_kasper-jews-christians_en.html

Can Hassidic philosopher, Martin Buber be credited as one of the teachers of the philosophical error of immanentism to the generation of immanentists currently populating Rome?

What is well known is Buber’s racist, pantheist (rebadged “panentheist” by him) understanding of Shekinah which he associated with physical “Israel” (i.e. “the Jews”). It would come as no surprise then that Kasper, after having been properly mentored in Judaic self-worship, would turn out to be one of the most valuable Judaic assets in the Vatican working in his capacity as President of the Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews.

Religious relations with “the Jews” have been on the up since Kasper’s appointment as any Catholic schoolchild can tell you after being lectured on the horrible nature of the Christian “teaching of contempt” (see: the Gospel) by an ADL rabbi, an ADL indoctrinated school teacher or through Catholic school teaching material produced by Judaic bankers documented here:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/01/judaics-preach-guilt-in-catholic.html

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/judaic-lawyerbanker-altering-curriculum.html

Kasper has spoken about Buber’s synthesis of “interfaith dialogue” which has proven so disastrous for Christianity:

“Dialogue” is a relatively new concept in philosophy and in theology as well. It has its roots in the personalistic philosophy of the first half of the 20th century, especially in the Jewish personalistic philosophy of Martin Buber, Franz Rosenzweig, Emanuel Levinas and others. (Walter Kasper, Communion Through Dialogue)

Kasper speaks lovingly of Buber’s diabolical “dialogical thinking”–change synthesized through dialogue–which is simply Hegelian dialectics by another name:

As Martin Buber, one of the most significant representatives of dialogical thinking, says, the truth is located not only in direct subject-object relations but in a “dia”, a “between” which is opened up between the dialogue partners and in which both have a share. Only in the “dia”, the between of a I-thou and a We-relation, do we “have” or, better, do we participate in the objective reality; the subject-object-reality is thus embedded in the subject-subject reality of communication and dialogue. (Walter Kasper, Communion Through Dialogue)

http://www.cmswr.org/nationalassembly/keynotespeaker.htm

With sublime Hassidic philosophical “truths” such as the above en vogue in Rome, it’s no wonder that there’s no longer any place for the clunky old thinking of St. Thomas.

How many of you knew how great the influence the thinking of Hassidic philospher, Martin Buber has been in the disastrous course the Vatican has taken in recent decades?

With that thought in mind, I have two questions for the writers and editors of Latin Mass magazine. I’ve seen that a series of articles has started in the recent edition of Latin Mass on the topic of the philosophical error of immanentism, the first article curiously citing virtually unknown “Hebrew Catholic,” Ronda Chervin as an authority for the Catholic side alongside St. Thomas, Pope St. Pius X and documents from the First Vatican Council.

Will the Judaic component of the subversion of Catholic thinking be addressed as it has been here, or will it continue to be studiously avoided as it traditionally has been in the past by Latin Mass magazine?

If it is the latter, who benefits from that arrangement?