Archive for the ‘New Catholic’ Category

Bonetus

September 18, 2012
Followers of the Kosher-Catholic containment operation “Rorate-Caeli” may recall “New Catholic” (scroll down to the comments) turning his audience over to a guest contributor by the name “Bonetus” with the endorsement, “We are pleased to introduce our new contributor, Bonetus, a very wise and pious man.”

And with this prodding of the traditional goyim to learn at the feet of the “very wise man,” “Bonetus” proceeded with a transparent, condescending agenda of defining the boundaries for acceptable speech on the topic of ‘The Jews’ beginning by dredging up a ridiculous paen to the alleged racial prestige of today’s Khazar ‘Jews’ of whom it is alleged “Christ was born according to the flesh” and “the Immaculate Virgin Mary [is] already their sister according to the flesh” in blatant mockery of St. John the Baptist, St. Paul, and Jesus Christ who had no tolerance for such racial boasting, even from true genetic Israelites of His time.

I mention “New Catholic’s”  heralding of the “very wise [Judaizing] man” “Bonetus” as an introduction to documentation on the early 16th century figure, “Bonetus,” the rabbi/physician/’prophet’/astrologer to who is commonly regarded as the most corrupt pope in the history of the Church, the Borgia pope, Alexander VI.

Contemporaries of Erasmus: a biographical register of the Renaissance and Reformation, Volumes 1-3, Page 196

From the Jewish Encyclopedia:

BONET DE LATES or LATTES (known in Hebrew as Jacob ben Immanuel Provinciale):

Physician and astrologer; known chiefly as the inventor of an astronomical ring-dial by means of which solar and stellar altitudes can be measured and the time determined with great precision by night as well as by day; lived in the latter part of the fifteenth century and the beginning of the sixteenth. Originally from Provence, and belonging to a family that had its origin in Lattes near Montpellier, he was forced to leave Provence with the rest of his brethren and settled in Carpentras. Thence he went to Rome, where he became physician to Pope Alexander VI. (1430-1503), and later to Pope Leo X. (1503-13). At this time he became rabbi of the Jewish community, to which he was able to render much assistance. He married the daughter of the physician Comprat Mossé of Aix. Bonet described the use of his instrument in a treatise written in Carpentras, the full title of which is: “Boneti de Latis, Medici Provenzalis, Annuli per eum Composti Super Astrologiæ Utilitate.” It appeared as a supplement to the “Calculatio Composta in Rima de Juliano de Dati,” Rome, 1493, and was dedicated to Pope Alexander VI. At the end Bonet craves pardon for his bad Latin, on the score of being a Hebrew. The treatise was republished by Jacob Faber of Etaples, together with his own commentary on John Sacrobosco’s “De Sphæra Mundi” and Euclid’s “Geometry,” Paris, 1500. Editions were also published in 1507, 1521, and 1534. Two editions appeared later at Marburg, in 1537 and 1557. In bad Latin, Bonet wrote a treatise entitled “Prognosticum,” published at Rome in 1498, and dedicated to cardinals Valentiniani and De Borgia, in which he predicted the coming of the Messiah in the year 1505 [!]. A full account of the book is to be found in Abraham Farrisol’s manuscript, “Magen Abraham,” or “Wikuaḥ ha-Dat.”

A pupil of the above-mentioned Jacob Faber, Charles Bovillus, 1470-1553, relates in the preface to his “Dialogi de Trinitate” that he met Bonet de Lates in the Roman ghetto in 1507, and went to his house in order to see the ring that he had invented …

It is evidence of the position held by Bonet at the papal court that on Oct. 13, 1513, [‘Christian Kabbalist’ Johannes] Reuchlin begged him to use his influence in order that the examination of the “Augenspiegel” [his defense against the heresy proceedings against him] should not be given into the hands of a commission made up of strangers [that is, believing Catholics], at all events not of Dominicans. Further, Bonet’s intercession seems to have been successful.

Bonet is known to have had two sons. One, Joseph, continued to remain in the papal favor; the other, Immanuel, was also in the service of the pope, from whom he received a regular salary.

http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/3526-bonet-de-lates

 

Dear reader, a certain contingent of traditional Catholics is attempting to resurrect the most depraved aspects of corrupt Renaissance era, Judaizing, superstitious, usurious ‘Catholicism’. Beware.

Also see:

The ‘Christian’ Nobleman/’Court-Jew’ Relationship

“Sistine Secrets”

Advertisements

Heavenly Jester

October 17, 2011
I admit, I’m not up on the new tradition, or maybe there’s something I’m missing that would make it virtuous or funny to intentionally deceive people as a setup for a self-serving ‘teachable moment.’ Evidently, I’m not alone. The implied lesson: believe the “New Catholic” who just deceived you, not Bp. Williamson.

But take “New Catholic’s” word for it, “this is very humorous,” even if it doesn’t seem so. This internet-published claim comes in tandem with his/her admonishment to use discernment in encountering material published on the internet. Indeed! To which I add, be as conscious of what is omitted as what is published, particularly with the Fellay camp’s P.R. outlet.

A Note from a Reader on ‘RORATE CÆLI’

July 21, 2009

This noteworthy comment on ‘RORATE CÆLI’ (a kosher ‘traditional Catholic’ affair) comes from a reader:

A “traditionalist” blog, http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com , is effectively patrolled by Judaizers who hate to be exposed as such.

A recent post there, “SSPX goes on trial in Britain, fails in bid to buy church,” failed to mention the Judaic involvement, but some readers, myself included, added those details learned here, some exposure of the evidence against “6 million” and “homicidal gas chambers,” and revived opposition to the head Judaizer “Jordanes,” arguing against his claim that Deuteronomy 17:8ff allowed the rabbis such liberty that they could not possibly be accused of “altering the very content of Mosaic revelation.”

Insistence that Deuteronomy 4:2, Josue 1:7-8 et al. define that the rabbis were required to legislate within the Law could not persuade this “Jordanes” that the rabbis had significantly voided the commandments of God for their own traditions.

Indeed, the very words of Jesus and the perennial exegesis of His Words have no weight against Judaizers in denial of the Faith.

It took only a few hours for the massive evidence adduced by many against “Jordanes” for the entire thread to be scrubbed.

I mention this in hopes that informed readers of this blog will themselves begin to patrol the Rorate Caeli Blog to post against the Judaizing there.

To no avail I have corresponded with the site’s supposed chaplain, Fr. Demets FSSP, in hopes that he can counsel “New Catholic” newcatholic at gmail.com and “Jordanes” (I have, but will not publish here his probable personal email) against their thorough scrubbing of all quotes from Jesus, the Apostles, Doctors, Saints, Popes, and Councils and scrubbing of all revelatory Torah quotes and rabbinical exegesis.

Perhaps some would like to join in a campaign against the Judaizers at that heavily traveled site.

Feel free to correspond with me in this or other matters at mark7verse9@gmail.com.

A Note from a Reader on ‘RORATE CÆLI’

July 21, 2009

This noteworthy comment on ‘RORATE CÆLI’ (a kosher ‘traditional Catholic’ affair) comes from a reader:

A “traditionalist” blog, http://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com , is effectively patrolled by Judaizers who hate to be exposed as such.

A recent post there, “SSPX goes on trial in Britain, fails in bid to buy church,” failed to mention the Judaic involvement, but some readers, myself included, added those details learned here, some exposure of the evidence against “6 million” and “homicidal gas chambers,” and revived opposition to the head Judaizer “Jordanes,” arguing against his claim that Deuteronomy 17:8ff allowed the rabbis such liberty that they could not possibly be accused of “altering the very content of Mosaic revelation.”

Insistence that Deuteronomy 4:2, Josue 1:7-8 et al. define that the rabbis were required to legislate within the Law could not persuade this “Jordanes” that the rabbis had significantly voided the commandments of God for their own traditions.

Indeed, the very words of Jesus and the perennial exegesis of His Words have no weight against Judaizers in denial of the Faith.

It took only a few hours for the massive evidence adduced by many against “Jordanes” for the entire thread to be scrubbed.

I mention this in hopes that informed readers of this blog will themselves begin to patrol the Rorate Caeli Blog to post against the Judaizing there.

To no avail I have corresponded with the site’s supposed chaplain, Fr. Demets FSSP, in hopes that he can counsel “New Catholic” newcatholic at gmail.com and “Jordanes” (I have, but will not publish here his probable personal email) against their thorough scrubbing of all quotes from Jesus, the Apostles, Doctors, Saints, Popes, and Councils and scrubbing of all revelatory Torah quotes and rabbinical exegesis.

Perhaps some would like to join in a campaign against the Judaizers at that heavily traveled site.

Feel free to correspond with me in this or other matters at mark7verse9@gmail.com.