Archive for the ‘Joke’ Category

"Hebrew Catholics" see: Khazar Talmudists

November 30, 2007

First, let me make clear that I do not use the ethnic term, “Khazar” in a derogatory way as I’ve seen others do quite often. I use the term because it is accurate. Moss, Barrack, Schoeman, et al, shouldn’t feel the slightest bit of shame in accepting their true ethnic identity. It is neither better or worse than Italian, Irish, German, Arab, etc., ethnicity. But “Khazar-Catholic” doesn’t garner quite the prestige, nor does it offer the great potential for mischief that “Hebrew-Catholic” does, and there lies the crux of the matter.

Let’s look at one example of such mischief from “Hebrew Catholic,” Marty Barrack:

Rabbi Yeshua spoke and taught from a background deeply imbued with the Halakha, the whole body of Jewish law embracing both the written (Torah) and oral (Talmud) traditions.

He told Thomas, Jn 14:6 “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.” Halakha means, “the way,” as on a pilgrim journey.

Literally, halakha comes from the Hebrew root HLCH, which means “walk.” It derives from halakh, “he walked,” which refers to Moses and later Yeshua leading us on a pilgrim journey to the promised land. It applies the Written and Oral Torah, the Talmud, and the rabbinic legislation and commentaries to every aspect of Jewish life. Rabbi Yeshua said, “I am the Halakha.” [parenthesis in original]

http://secondexodus.com/html/basics/centralapostolate.htm

Marty Barrack is babbling dementia here. Jesus Christ did not teach from the talmudic tradition. Jesus spoke as one with authority, the Word Incarnate, often quoting the biblical scripture which He authored. Christ condemned the man-made talmudic tradition repeatedly throughout the Gospels as the tradition of the elders which makes void the Word of God. Mr. Barrack is dragging his anti-biblical talmudic baggage with him into the Catholic fold and attempting to baptize a diabolical conjunction of opposites. But all the holy water in the world cannot sanctify what Christ Himself condemned.

Perhaps Barrack shouldn’t be criticized too harshly when such luminaries as Alice von Hildebrand and high church prelates gush over “Jewish converts” of this type, bending over backwards to sponsor them and their Judaizing books, conferences and parish seders. The one Catholic writer who did speak against this outrage, other than Michael A. Hoffman in his pamphlet, The Role of the Merchants of Venom, Robert Sungenis, recently abandoned the example of Christ and the Apostles and censored himself in obedience to the demands of his Judaizing bishop, Kevin C. Rhoades, a preacher of the theology of mythical Auschwitz homicidal gas chambers.

Enough from me then:

The … Jews … omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates? [Matthew 15;9]

Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the Talmud–and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities–they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets … (Pope Innocent IV, May 9, 1244 Letter to King Louis IX of France)

Pope Innocent IV makes reference to the talmudic tradition that Marty Barrack is attempting to put in Christ’s mouth; a tradition of erroneous abuses and unheard-of stupidities, which renders those who adhere to it utterly alien from the law and the prophets, the very tradition which Christ condemned with His mouth, as Innocent IV plainly states. But today’s bamboozled Catholics are so charmed by these deluded Khazars, and taken by the notion that they have some kind of magical blood in their veins that they’d toss the entire Gospel to go along with the “Hebrew Catholic” charade. After all, these are “chosen people”! What a great prize for the Church!

What a joke!

Give up your pagan Talmud and Kabbalah–like my Celt ancestors gave up their pagan traditions–and come to the true Catholic faith. Give up your delusional “chosen people” myth and accept your true ethnicity. It’s time that this farce was ended.

"Hebrew Catholics" see: Khazar Talmudists

November 30, 2007

First, let me make clear that I do not use the ethnic term, “Khazar” in a derogatory way as I’ve seen others do quite often. I use the term because it is accurate. Moss, Barrack, Schoeman, et al, shouldn’t feel the slightest bit of shame in accepting their true ethnic identity. It is neither better or worse than Italian, Irish, German, Arab, etc., ethnicity. But “Khazar-Catholic” doesn’t garner quite the prestige, nor does it offer the great potential for mischief that “Hebrew-Catholic” does, and there lies the crux of the matter.

Let’s look at one example of such mischief from “Hebrew Catholic,” Marty Barrack:

Rabbi Yeshua spoke and taught from a background deeply imbued with the Halakha, the whole body of Jewish law embracing both the written (Torah) and oral (Talmud) traditions.

He told Thomas, Jn 14:6 “I am the way, and the truth, and the life.” Halakha means, “the way,” as on a pilgrim journey.

Literally, halakha comes from the Hebrew root HLCH, which means “walk.” It derives from halakh, “he walked,” which refers to Moses and later Yeshua leading us on a pilgrim journey to the promised land. It applies the Written and Oral Torah, the Talmud, and the rabbinic legislation and commentaries to every aspect of Jewish life. Rabbi Yeshua said, “I am the Halakha.” [parenthesis in original]

http://secondexodus.com/html/basics/centralapostolate.htm

Marty Barrack is babbling dementia here. Jesus Christ did not teach from the talmudic tradition. Jesus spoke as one with authority, the Word Incarnate, often quoting the biblical scripture which He authored. Christ condemned the man-made talmudic tradition repeatedly throughout the Gospels as the tradition of the elders which makes void the Word of God. Mr. Barrack is dragging his anti-biblical talmudic baggage with him into the Catholic fold and attempting to baptize a diabolical conjunction of opposites. But all the holy water in the world cannot sanctify what Christ Himself condemned.

Perhaps Barrack shouldn’t be criticized too harshly when such luminaries as Alice von Hildebrand and high church prelates gush over “Jewish converts” of this type, bending over backwards to sponsor them and their Judaizing books, conferences and parish seders. The one Catholic writer who did speak against this outrage, other than Michael A. Hoffman in his pamphlet, The Role of the Merchants of Venom, Robert Sungenis, recently abandoned the example of Christ and the Apostles and censored himself in obedience to the demands of his Judaizing bishop, Kevin C. Rhoades, a preacher of the theology of mythical Auschwitz homicidal gas chambers.

Enough from me then:

The … Jews … omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates? [Matthew 15;9]

Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the Talmud–and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities–they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets … (Pope Innocent IV, May 9, 1244 Letter to King Louis IX of France)

Pope Innocent IV makes reference to the talmudic tradition that Marty Barrack is attempting to put in Christ’s mouth; a tradition of erroneous abuses and unheard-of stupidities, which renders those who adhere to it utterly alien from the law and the prophets, the very tradition which Christ condemned with His mouth, as Innocent IV plainly states. But today’s bamboozled Catholics are so charmed by these deluded Khazars, and taken by the notion that they have some kind of magical blood in their veins that they’d toss the entire Gospel to go along with the “Hebrew Catholic” charade. After all, these are “chosen people”! What a great prize for the Church!

What a joke!

Give up your pagan Talmud and Kabbalah–like my Celt ancestors gave up their pagan traditions–and come to the true Catholic faith. Give up your delusional “chosen people” myth and accept your true ethnicity. It’s time that this farce was ended.

CNBC’s Allen Wastler Posit’s Ron Paul Poll Results Due to Conspiracy

October 13, 2007

In an Orwellian bit of prose titled, “An Open Letter to the Ron Paul Faithful,” CNBC.com managing editor, Allen Wastler explains why he prematurely removed an online poll which had Ron Paul beating all of the other Republican candidates by a large margin. He theorizes that the poll results could only be due to a “well-organized and committed” conspiracy of Ron Paul supporters!

Wastler concludes with the following amazing statement:

“When a well-organized and committed “few” can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of “the many,” I get a little worried.”

http://www.cnbc.com/id/21257762

I don’t recall Wastler expressing any concern regarding the well-organized and committed faithful “few” of the Zionist lobby who throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of “the many,” however.

CNBC’s Allen Wastler Posit’s Ron Paul Poll Results Due to Conspiracy

October 13, 2007

In an Orwellian bit of prose titled, “An Open Letter to the Ron Paul Faithful,” CNBC.com managing editor, Allen Wastler explains why he prematurely removed an online poll which had Ron Paul beating all of the other Republican candidates by a large margin. He theorizes that the poll results could only be due to a “well-organized and committed” conspiracy of Ron Paul supporters!

Wastler concludes with the following amazing statement:

“When a well-organized and committed “few” can throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of “the many,” I get a little worried.”

http://www.cnbc.com/id/21257762

I don’t recall Wastler expressing any concern regarding the well-organized and committed faithful “few” of the Zionist lobby who throw the results of a system meant to reflect the sentiments of “the many,” however.