Archive for the ‘Hypocrites’ Category

Hypocrites!

February 11, 2008

It’s now being reported that the rabbis are going to condemn Benedict’s prayer that he made up for them and foisted upon traditionalists on Shrove Tuesday last week. This is “Jewish” high drama. This serves to make Catholicism seem ever more wicked in the eyes of the world and in need of further updating. It also makes the Vatican appear to be besieged in the eyes of the “trads” and brings support from the foolish among them based upon that appearance. Already “trads” are arguing amongst themselves over the orthodoxy of a prayer which should be rejected straightaway solely based upon it being a concession to enemies of the faith. Once again Catholics have been played by the masters of the dialectic.

Why has this played out in such a devastating way as it has? Because everyone involved in this debacle has forsaken the example set by Jesus Christ for how to deal with Pharisees and their gambits:

“Then came to him from Jerusalem scribes and Pharisees, saying: Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the ancients? For they wash not their hands when they eat bread. But he answering, said to them: Why do you also transgress the commandment of God for your tradition?” (Matthew 15;1-3)

There, plain and simple, is the example from Jesus Christ for how to handle Pharisees and their hypocritical gambits–an example we are called to imitate but so rarely do.

When the Pharisees come knocking asking us to change our prayers for the salvation of their eternal souls saying they’re offended by them, the correct answer is, “HYPOCRITES! You who curse us and pray for our destruction three times daily in your obligatory Birkat HaMinim have the audacity to demand that we change our prayers for your salvation? We will not exchange the truth for lies, and may God forgive you for even entertaining the thought!”

Who can come up with a better strategy than Christ?

Here is your ammunition:

And for Christians let there be no hope, and may all the evil in an instant be destroyed and all thy enemies be cut down swiftly; and the evil ones uproot and break and destroy and humble soon in our days. Blessed are you lord who breaks enemies and humbles sinners. (Birkat HaMinim, “Benediction” #12 of the Shmone Esreh (18 Benedictions) mandated by halacha to be prayed by every Orthodox Judaic male three times daily).

This “benediction” is 1918 years old. It predates the Good Friday prayer for the conversion of the Jews by centuries. There can be no argument that it was a reaction to “antisemitism” and “Christian violence” as was formulated at the time when the fledgling Christian Church was being persecuted by the synagogues. It has been mandatory that Orthodox Judaic males recite this curse against Christians for 1918 years now and Abe Foxman, The Chief Rabbinate of Israel, Rabbi-Knight David Rosen, the AJC and the rest of the Pharisees who have demanded that the Catholic liturgy be altered to their specification KNOW THIS. They’re hypocrites. In fact, they’re twice the hypocrite children of hell as their Pharisee spiritual forefathers of whom Christ said: “hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves.”

Advertisements

Hypocrites!

February 11, 2008

It’s now being reported that the rabbis are going to condemn Benedict’s prayer that he made up for them and foisted upon traditionalists on Shrove Tuesday last week. This is “Jewish” high drama. This serves to make Catholicism seem ever more wicked in the eyes of the world and in need of further updating. It also makes the Vatican appear to be besieged in the eyes of the “trads” and brings support from the foolish among them based upon that appearance. Already “trads” are arguing amongst themselves over the orthodoxy of a prayer which should be rejected straightaway solely based upon it being a concession to enemies of the faith. Once again Catholics have been played by the masters of the dialectic.

Why has this played out in such a devastating way as it has? Because everyone involved in this debacle has forsaken the example set by Jesus Christ for how to deal with Pharisees and their gambits:

“Then came to him from Jerusalem scribes and Pharisees, saying: Why do thy disciples transgress the tradition of the ancients? For they wash not their hands when they eat bread. But he answering, said to them: Why do you also transgress the commandment of God for your tradition?” (Matthew 15;1-3)

There, plain and simple, is the example from Jesus Christ for how to handle Pharisees and their hypocritical gambits–an example we are called to imitate but so rarely do.

When the Pharisees come knocking asking us to change our prayers for the salvation of their eternal souls saying they’re offended by them, the correct answer is, “HYPOCRITES! You who curse us and pray for our destruction three times daily in your obligatory Birkat HaMinim have the audacity to demand that we change our prayers for your salvation? We will not exchange the truth for lies, and may God forgive you for even entertaining the thought!”

Who can come up with a better strategy than Christ?

Here is your ammunition:

And for Christians let there be no hope, and may all the evil in an instant be destroyed and all thy enemies be cut down swiftly; and the evil ones uproot and break and destroy and humble soon in our days. Blessed are you lord who breaks enemies and humbles sinners. (Birkat HaMinim, “Benediction” #12 of the Shmone Esreh (18 Benedictions) mandated by halacha to be prayed by every Orthodox Judaic male three times daily).

This “benediction” is 1918 years old. It predates the Good Friday prayer for the conversion of the Jews by centuries. There can be no argument that it was a reaction to “antisemitism” and “Christian violence” as was formulated at the time when the fledgling Christian Church was being persecuted by the synagogues. It has been mandatory that Orthodox Judaic males recite this curse against Christians for 1918 years now and Abe Foxman, The Chief Rabbinate of Israel, Rabbi-Knight David Rosen, the AJC and the rest of the Pharisees who have demanded that the Catholic liturgy be altered to their specification KNOW THIS. They’re hypocrites. In fact, they’re twice the hypocrite children of hell as their Pharisee spiritual forefathers of whom Christ said: “hypocrites; because you go round about the sea and the land to make one proselyte; and when he is made, you make him the child of hell twofold more than yourselves.”

Zionist Slapschtick

December 8, 2007

Arab dignitaries react to the Zionist bit with the proper response: a knee slap and guffaw. When will the same be the case in the U.S.?

Israel no nuclear threat to neighbours, says Gates

By Kristin Roberts
Reuters – Saturday, December 8

MANAMA (Reuters) – U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates defended Israel’s nuclear programme on Saturday, saying the Jewish state did not seek to destroy its neighbours or support terrorism, unlike Iran.

Asked at the Manama Dialogue conference whether Israel’s nuclear programme posed a threat to the region, Gates replied: “No, I do not.”

The statement was greeted by laughter from a room filled with government officials from Middle Eastern countries.

Israel is widely assumed to have the region’s only atomic arsenal, but declines to confirm or deny it. Washington has long avoided pressing Israel to go public with its capabilities.

Gates did not specifically mention Israel’s nuclear weapons or arsenal, but responded to questions about its “nuclear programme” — giving the Pentagon chief room to dismiss any suggestion that he implicitly confirmed the weapons’ existence in Israel.

He dismissed the allegation that the United States applied a double standard on the nuclear issue by supporting Israel while calling for Iran to abandon its enrichment activities, which Tehran says are for peaceful purposes.

“Israel is not training terrorists to subvert its neighbours. It has not shipped weapons into a place like Iraq to kill thousands of innocent civilians covertly,” Gates said.

“It has not threatened to destroy any of its neighbours. It is not trying to destabilise the government of Lebanon.

“So I think there are significant differences in terms of both the history and the behaviour of the Iranian and Israeli governments. I understand there is a difference of view on that,” he said.

Iran denies U.S. allegations that it has armed, trained and funded Shi’ite militias in Iraq, blaming the violence in Iraq on the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.

A year ago, Gates first angered Israelis during testimony to the U.S. Congress by including Israel in a list of nuclear-armed countries that surround Iran to explain why Tehran might have sought the means to build an atomic bomb. He has not publicly discussed it since.

Israel admits to having two atomic reactors, describing them officially as research facilities. Its refusal to discuss any nuclear weapons capabilities or accept international inspections at the facilities is a major irritant for Arabs and Iran, which see it as a contradiction in U.S. policy in the region.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20071208/twl-uk-israel-nuclear-gates-bd5ae06_1.html

Zionist Slapschtick

December 8, 2007

Arab dignitaries react to the Zionist bit with the proper response: a knee slap and guffaw. When will the same be the case in the U.S.?

Israel no nuclear threat to neighbours, says Gates

By Kristin Roberts
Reuters – Saturday, December 8

MANAMA (Reuters) – U.S. Defence Secretary Robert Gates defended Israel’s nuclear programme on Saturday, saying the Jewish state did not seek to destroy its neighbours or support terrorism, unlike Iran.

Asked at the Manama Dialogue conference whether Israel’s nuclear programme posed a threat to the region, Gates replied: “No, I do not.”

The statement was greeted by laughter from a room filled with government officials from Middle Eastern countries.

Israel is widely assumed to have the region’s only atomic arsenal, but declines to confirm or deny it. Washington has long avoided pressing Israel to go public with its capabilities.

Gates did not specifically mention Israel’s nuclear weapons or arsenal, but responded to questions about its “nuclear programme” — giving the Pentagon chief room to dismiss any suggestion that he implicitly confirmed the weapons’ existence in Israel.

He dismissed the allegation that the United States applied a double standard on the nuclear issue by supporting Israel while calling for Iran to abandon its enrichment activities, which Tehran says are for peaceful purposes.

“Israel is not training terrorists to subvert its neighbours. It has not shipped weapons into a place like Iraq to kill thousands of innocent civilians covertly,” Gates said.

“It has not threatened to destroy any of its neighbours. It is not trying to destabilise the government of Lebanon.

“So I think there are significant differences in terms of both the history and the behaviour of the Iranian and Israeli governments. I understand there is a difference of view on that,” he said.

Iran denies U.S. allegations that it has armed, trained and funded Shi’ite militias in Iraq, blaming the violence in Iraq on the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein in 2003.

A year ago, Gates first angered Israelis during testimony to the U.S. Congress by including Israel in a list of nuclear-armed countries that surround Iran to explain why Tehran might have sought the means to build an atomic bomb. He has not publicly discussed it since.

Israel admits to having two atomic reactors, describing them officially as research facilities. Its refusal to discuss any nuclear weapons capabilities or accept international inspections at the facilities is a major irritant for Arabs and Iran, which see it as a contradiction in U.S. policy in the region.

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/rtrs/20071208/twl-uk-israel-nuclear-gates-bd5ae06_1.html

"Elder Brother" Rabbis: Catholicism is Idolatry, But Buddhism and Islam are Not

October 17, 2007

Here is an excerpt from the Jerusalem Post’s Q&A with Rabbi Chaim Brovender in which the good rabbi explains that burning incense to a Buddha statue is not idolatry but entering a Catholic church is “problematic”. The term Avoda Zara means “idolatry”:

Q: I was recently on a business trip, and while I found the city to be very nice etc., I am a bit concerned. I visited an Asian restaurant, not owned by Jews, (Under the local Rabbis) There seemed to be active idolatry taking place. There was a statue of Buddha, where they had placed a large bowl of oranges and burning incense right in the entrance to the place. At the end of the meal I was served oranges (Possibly ones that were previously in front of Buddha) Is this place considered a “Bais Avodah Zorah” ? And can a Jew eat there?

A: Avoda Zara should certainly be avoided. For that reason going into a Catholic church (perhaps real idolatry) is problematic. However, Buddism is different. There the reference is to a great religious teacher called “the enlightened one”. It is hard to imagine why this might be called Avoda Zara. (Ask the rabbi, Jerusalem Post, Rabbi Chaim Brovender, Aug. 21, 2007)

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1191257262887&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Some may recall that during Cardinal Lustiger’s funeral recently one commentator noted that the Conservative and Orthodox rabbis in attendance would not enter the Cathedral:

Inside the cathedral a special area was reserved in the front rows for “the Jewish Community.” France’s leading Reform rabbi, Daniel Fahri, was there with his wife, but no Conservative or Orthodox rabbi attended. “They wouldn’t step foot in here,” a friend confided to me …

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/08/lustigers-alchemical-funeral-update.html

This is based upon the ruling of the most authoritative “sage” of Judaism, Moses Maimonides:

“The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday…” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4)

“The Christians are worshipers of Avodah Zarah” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Ma’akhalot Assurot, 11:7)

It may interest “Judeo-Christians” to know that while “elder brother” Maimonides strictly maintained Christians to be idolaters, he ruled that Muslims are not idolators:

“These Muslims [Ishmaelim] are not in any way idolators. [Idolatry] has already been removed from their mouths and their hearts, and they unify G-d in the appropriate manner without any admixture [of idolatrous beliefs].” (Maimonides, Responsa, 448)

However, this should not be taken to mean that Islam should be tolerated according to Maimonides. In fact, Maimonides completely forbids Islam under Judaic rule (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 8;11). Christians and Muslims would be forced to accept the Talmudic religion for goys, the “Noahide Laws.” Christians who uphold the Trinity and the Divinity of Christ would be executed:

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

I hope that this may shed some light upon the monstrous terms “Judeo-Christian tradition,” and “elder brothers in the faith” and the crazy notion that “Israel” is a bulwark against the decline of Christian civilization.

For further information:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/07/real-hidden-dangers-of-rainbow.html

"Elder Brother" Rabbis: Catholicism is Idolatry, But Buddhism and Islam are Not

October 17, 2007

Here is an excerpt from the Jerusalem Post’s Q&A with Rabbi Chaim Brovender in which the good rabbi explains that burning incense to a Buddha statue is not idolatry but entering a Catholic church is “problematic”. The term Avoda Zara means “idolatry”:

Q: I was recently on a business trip, and while I found the city to be very nice etc., I am a bit concerned. I visited an Asian restaurant, not owned by Jews, (Under the local Rabbis) There seemed to be active idolatry taking place. There was a statue of Buddha, where they had placed a large bowl of oranges and burning incense right in the entrance to the place. At the end of the meal I was served oranges (Possibly ones that were previously in front of Buddha) Is this place considered a “Bais Avodah Zorah” ? And can a Jew eat there?

A: Avoda Zara should certainly be avoided. For that reason going into a Catholic church (perhaps real idolatry) is problematic. However, Buddism is different. There the reference is to a great religious teacher called “the enlightened one”. It is hard to imagine why this might be called Avoda Zara. (Ask the rabbi, Jerusalem Post, Rabbi Chaim Brovender, Aug. 21, 2007)

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1191257262887&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

Some may recall that during Cardinal Lustiger’s funeral recently one commentator noted that the Conservative and Orthodox rabbis in attendance would not enter the Cathedral:

Inside the cathedral a special area was reserved in the front rows for “the Jewish Community.” France’s leading Reform rabbi, Daniel Fahri, was there with his wife, but no Conservative or Orthodox rabbi attended. “They wouldn’t step foot in here,” a friend confided to me …

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/08/lustigers-alchemical-funeral-update.html

This is based upon the ruling of the most authoritative “sage” of Judaism, Moses Maimonides:

“The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday…” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4)

“The Christians are worshipers of Avodah Zarah” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Ma’akhalot Assurot, 11:7)

It may interest “Judeo-Christians” to know that while “elder brother” Maimonides strictly maintained Christians to be idolaters, he ruled that Muslims are not idolators:

“These Muslims [Ishmaelim] are not in any way idolators. [Idolatry] has already been removed from their mouths and their hearts, and they unify G-d in the appropriate manner without any admixture [of idolatrous beliefs].” (Maimonides, Responsa, 448)

However, this should not be taken to mean that Islam should be tolerated according to Maimonides. In fact, Maimonides completely forbids Islam under Judaic rule (Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 8;11). Christians and Muslims would be forced to accept the Talmudic religion for goys, the “Noahide Laws.” Christians who uphold the Trinity and the Divinity of Christ would be executed:

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

I hope that this may shed some light upon the monstrous terms “Judeo-Christian tradition,” and “elder brothers in the faith” and the crazy notion that “Israel” is a bulwark against the decline of Christian civilization.

For further information:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/07/real-hidden-dangers-of-rainbow.html

Armenian Community Provides a Model for Turning the Tables on the Thought Cops

August 18, 2007

At the following link:

No Place For Genocide Denial

Credit to:

http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/

Armenian Community Provides a Model for Turning the Tables on the Thought Cops

August 18, 2007

At the following link:

No Place For Genocide Denial

Credit to:

http://jewishracism.blogspot.com/