Archive for the ‘Capital Punishment’ Category

Riskin to Launch Noahide Center

May 30, 2008

Riskin to launch interfaith center

Jewish Telegraph Agency

05/29/2008

Rabbi Shlomo Riskin is launching an Orthodox center for dialogue with Christians.

Organizers of the Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation say it is the first Orthodox Jewish institution of its kind dedicated to theological dialogue with Christians.

The center, which is slated to open in June in Efrat, Israel, will host seminars for Jewish and Christian scholars and promote research aimed at making religion an instrument of peace in the world.

“A sea change has occurred since the Shoah,” Riskin, the chief rabbi of Efrat, told the Christian Post. “Most churches now teach that God remains faithful to His covenant with the Jewish people, and that the biblical promise is continually being reaffirmed by the Jewish return to its homeland in Zion.”

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/108822.html

In January 2008, in a Jerusalem Post editorial, Rabbi Shlomo Riskin reminded his fellow so-called “Jews” that they’re obligated to proselytize the “Goyim” to follow the anti-Biblical Talmudic “Noahide Laws:”

… Maimonides rules that only the Jews must keep the 613 commandments for ultimate “salvation”; it is enough for the gentile world to accept the Seven Noahide Laws of morality (Laws of Kings [Hilchot Melachim] 8,10).

But we certainly must proselytize every human being to keep those seven laws … (Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, “Parashat Yitro: Every Knee Shall Bend,” Jerusalem Post, Jan 24, 2008)

See:

Who Says Judaism Isn’t a Proselytizing System?

Riskin to Launch Noahide Center

May 30, 2008

Riskin to launch interfaith center

Jewish Telegraph Agency

05/29/2008

Rabbi Shlomo Riskin is launching an Orthodox center for dialogue with Christians.

Organizers of the Center for Jewish-Christian Understanding and Cooperation say it is the first Orthodox Jewish institution of its kind dedicated to theological dialogue with Christians.

The center, which is slated to open in June in Efrat, Israel, will host seminars for Jewish and Christian scholars and promote research aimed at making religion an instrument of peace in the world.

“A sea change has occurred since the Shoah,” Riskin, the chief rabbi of Efrat, told the Christian Post. “Most churches now teach that God remains faithful to His covenant with the Jewish people, and that the biblical promise is continually being reaffirmed by the Jewish return to its homeland in Zion.”

http://www.jta.org/cgi-bin/iowa/breaking/108822.html

In January 2008, in a Jerusalem Post editorial, Rabbi Shlomo Riskin reminded his fellow so-called “Jews” that they’re obligated to proselytize the “Goyim” to follow the anti-Biblical Talmudic “Noahide Laws:”

… Maimonides rules that only the Jews must keep the 613 commandments for ultimate “salvation”; it is enough for the gentile world to accept the Seven Noahide Laws of morality (Laws of Kings [Hilchot Melachim] 8,10).

But we certainly must proselytize every human being to keep those seven laws … (Rabbi Shlomo Riskin, “Parashat Yitro: Every Knee Shall Bend,” Jerusalem Post, Jan 24, 2008)

See:

Who Says Judaism Isn’t a Proselytizing System?

Vatican Warns Against Islamic Sharia Law While Embracing Rabbinic Noahide Law

March 12, 2008

The Vatican has cast its lot with the worse of two evils:

Vatican official says Anglican head naive on Sharia

By Philip Pullella

ROME, March 11 (Reuters) – The Vatican’s top man for relations with Islam on Tuesday criticised the Archbishop of Canterbury as mistaken and “naive” for suggesting that some aspects of Sharia law in Britain were unavoidable …

“One can understand his good intentions but it seems to me he did not take into consideration either them (the Muslims), the English juridical system, or the reality of Sharia,” said [Cardinal Jean-Louis] Tauran, president of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue …

Full article:

http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnL11174744.html

Compare the above Vatican warning against Islamic Sharia law with the Vatican’s embrace of rabbinic “Noahide laws”:

Papal Commission Promotes Noahide Laws

also see:

Something is Seriously Wrong Here

Vatican Warns Against Islamic Sharia Law While Embracing Rabbinic Noahide Law

March 12, 2008

The Vatican has cast its lot with the worse of two evils:

Vatican official says Anglican head naive on Sharia

By Philip Pullella

ROME, March 11 (Reuters) – The Vatican’s top man for relations with Islam on Tuesday criticised the Archbishop of Canterbury as mistaken and “naive” for suggesting that some aspects of Sharia law in Britain were unavoidable …

“One can understand his good intentions but it seems to me he did not take into consideration either them (the Muslims), the English juridical system, or the reality of Sharia,” said [Cardinal Jean-Louis] Tauran, president of the Vatican’s Pontifical Council for Interreligious Dialogue …

Full article:

http://africa.reuters.com/wire/news/usnL11174744.html

Compare the above Vatican warning against Islamic Sharia law with the Vatican’s embrace of rabbinic “Noahide laws”:

Papal Commission Promotes Noahide Laws

also see:

Something is Seriously Wrong Here

The REAL Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow

July 30, 2007

Some of you may have read this book, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, by Constance Cumbey, a book on the New Age movement in which it is said that true Christians would not make it into the New Age alive. Have you made the connection that this book does not make?

“Sons of Noah,” or Noahide

“It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed.” (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma’ariv, October 6, 2004)

http://www.peacenow.org/mepr.asp?rid=&cid=141

The rainbow is the symbol of the Noahide movement–the movement to bring humanity under a rabbinic system of double standards called “Noahide Law” enforced by subsidiary courts of a Sanhedrin based in Jerusalem.

From Chabad Lubavitch website, noahide.org:

The Seven Noachide laws are general commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see the Rambam’s Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital punishment in Torah are: S’kilah – Stoning; S’rifah – Burning; Hereg – Decapitation; Henek – Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a, b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).

http://www.noahide.org/article.asp?Level=173&Parent=166

From the Talmud:

“A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

“A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

From the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

“… violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).”(Encyclopaedia Judaica, “Noahide Laws”)

From Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah:

“The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday…” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4)

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

Also see:

JPII’s Noahide Jest

Chabad Rabbi to Congress: Congress Convenes to Fulfill Noahide Commandment

Papal Commission Says Noahide Laws have New Testament Basis

Benedict XVI and Hans Kung Discuss Need for “Global Ethic,” not the Gospel

U.S. Public Law, “Education Day”

Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides

Ronald Regan and Chabad

US President George W. Bush Discusses “Road-Map to World Peace” Based on Seven Universal Ben Noah Laws

Jewish Law Comes to Washington D.C.

Jewish law institute launched in DC

The REAL Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow

July 30, 2007

Some of you may have read this book, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, by Constance Cumbey, a book on the New Age movement in which it is said that true Christians would not make it into the New Age alive. Have you made the connection that this book does not make?

“Sons of Noah,” or Noahide

“It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed.” (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma’ariv, October 6, 2004)

http://www.peacenow.org/mepr.asp?rid=&cid=141

The rainbow is the symbol of the Noahide movement–the movement to bring humanity under a rabbinic system of double standards called “Noahide Law” enforced by subsidiary courts of a Sanhedrin based in Jerusalem.

From Chabad Lubavitch website, noahide.org:

The Seven Noachide laws are general commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see the Rambam’s Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital punishment in Torah are: S’kilah – Stoning; S’rifah – Burning; Hereg – Decapitation; Henek – Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a, b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).

http://www.noahide.org/article.asp?Level=173&Parent=166

From the Talmud:

“A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

“A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

From the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

“… violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).”(Encyclopaedia Judaica, “Noahide Laws”)

From Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah:

“The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday…” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4)

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

Also see:

JPII’s Noahide Jest

Chabad Rabbi to Congress: Congress Convenes to Fulfill Noahide Commandment

Papal Commission Says Noahide Laws have New Testament Basis

Benedict XVI and Hans Kung Discuss Need for “Global Ethic,” not the Gospel

U.S. Public Law, “Education Day”

Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides

Ronald Regan and Chabad

US President George W. Bush Discusses “Road-Map to World Peace” Based on Seven Universal Ben Noah Laws

Jewish Law Comes to Washington D.C.

Jewish law institute launched in DC

The REAL Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow

July 30, 2007

Some of you may have read this book, Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, by Constance Cumbey, a book on the New Age movement in which it is said that true Christians would not make it into the New Age alive. Have you made the connection that this book does not make?

“Sons of Noah,” or Noahide

“It is our duty to force all mankind to accept the seven Noahide laws, and if not—they will be killed.” (Rabbi Yitzhak Ginsburg, Ma’ariv, October 6, 2004)

http://www.peacenow.org/mepr.asp?rid=&cid=141

The rainbow is the symbol of the Noahide movement–the movement to bring humanity under a rabbinic system of double standards called “Noahide Law” enforced by subsidiary courts of a Sanhedrin based in Jerusalem.

From Chabad Lubavitch website, noahide.org:

The Seven Noachide laws are general commandments with many details. Transgressing any one of them is considered such a breach in the natural order that the offender incurs the death penalty. Apart from a few exceptions, the death sentence for a Ben Noach is Sayif, death by the sword / decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see the Rambam’s Hilchos Melachim 9:14). (The four methods of capital punishment in Torah are: S’kilah – Stoning; S’rifah – Burning; Hereg – Decapitation; Henek – Strangulation.) The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachite. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (Sanhedrin 57a, b; Rambam, Hilchos Melakim 9:14).

http://www.noahide.org/article.asp?Level=173&Parent=166

From the Talmud:

“A non-Jew is put to death on the basis of a decision given by one judge [no jury], and on the basis of testimony given by a single witness, and even if he was not given a proper warning prior to the commission of his offense. He is put to death on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a man but not on the basis of testimony and a decision given by a woman, and the man who testified or decided against him can even be a relative.

“A Jew can only be put to death by a court of twenty-three judges, and on the basis of the testimony of two male witnesses who are not disqualified from testifying on account of kinship, and after being properly warned against committing the transgression. But none of these rules apply in the case of a non-Jew.” (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 57b, Steinsaltz edition, vol.18, page 110)

From the Encyclopaedia Judaica:

“… violation of any one of the seven laws subjects the Noachide to capital punishment by decapitation (Sanh. 57a).”(Encyclopaedia Judaica, “Noahide Laws”)

From Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah:

“The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday…” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4)

“… a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner. A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment.” (Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Hilchot Melachim 11)

Also see:

JPII’s Noahide Jest

Chabad Rabbi to Congress: Congress Convenes to Fulfill Noahide Commandment

Papal Commission Says Noahide Laws have New Testament Basis

Benedict XVI and Hans Kung Discuss Need for “Global Ethic,” not the Gospel

U.S. Public Law, “Education Day”

Sanhedrin Moves to Establish Council For Noahides

Ronald Regan and Chabad

US President George W. Bush Discusses “Road-Map to World Peace” Based on Seven Universal Ben Noah Laws

Jewish Law Comes to Washington D.C.

Jewish law institute launched in DC

The Cardinal Bea Centre for Judaic Studies at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome

April 10, 2007

What is characterized by some as “‘antisemitic’ conspiracy theory” when it’s written about at this blog is called “interfaith dialog” when it takes place between Cardinals and rabbis in Rome.

The Sephardic front is authoritatively represented by Maimonides, who … [treats] all Christians as “idolaters” tout-court. Next to this negative vision of Christian theology, Maimonides does however give a more open and moderate assessment of the Messianic role of Christianity and Islam in the world. Here is for instance a passage of the Treatise on Kings, which does not appear in all editions (of the Mishneh Torah), because in most of them it is censored: “… all the words of Jesus of Nazareth and of the son of Ishmael [Mohammed] who came after him are aimed at paving the way to the King-Messiah and at preparing the whole world to serve God together, as it is written: ‘because I shall then transform the language of the peoples into a pure language, so that all shall invoke the Name of the Lord shall serve him in a sole unit [all together, in harmony]’ (Sof. 3,9)”. …Maimonides lets Christianity and Islam, so to speak, do a “qualitative leap”: he includes the two religions within a sole providential plan that sees them as protagonists of a preparatory itinerary of humanity as a whole towards the [Judaic] Messianic event.

Maimonides’ ambivalent opinion – negatively on the theological level, but positively open in its Messianic perspective – appears to be the clearest and most straightforward affirmation of the involvement of Christianity in a providential role of a Messianic-providential type. And this opinion continues to represent a major stepping stone in the path that Christianity and Judaism make together, though along parallel and distinct planes. Maybe even the category of the “descendants of Noah,” which is admittedly rather inadequate and weak, may still be used to think of Christianity in Jewish terms and to reconcile conceptually (and not only conceptually) the two religions.(Rabbi Prof. Giuseppe Laras, Rome, 4th November 2004 at the Pontifical Gregorian University)

http://www.bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/center/conferences/Bea_Centre_C-J_Relations_04-05/Laras.htm

Does this sound familiar? It should, if you read the following essay entered on this blog a few months ago: http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/jpiis-522-jest-at-expense-of-noachides.html

The Cardinal Bea Centre for Judaic Studies at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome

April 10, 2007

What is characterized by some as “‘antisemitic’ conspiracy theory” when it’s written about at this blog is called “interfaith dialog” when it takes place between Cardinals and rabbis in Rome.

The Sephardic front is authoritatively represented by Maimonides, who … [treats] all Christians as “idolaters” tout-court. Next to this negative vision of Christian theology, Maimonides does however give a more open and moderate assessment of the Messianic role of Christianity and Islam in the world. Here is for instance a passage of the Treatise on Kings, which does not appear in all editions (of the Mishneh Torah), because in most of them it is censored: “… all the words of Jesus of Nazareth and of the son of Ishmael [Mohammed] who came after him are aimed at paving the way to the King-Messiah and at preparing the whole world to serve God together, as it is written: ‘because I shall then transform the language of the peoples into a pure language, so that all shall invoke the Name of the Lord shall serve him in a sole unit [all together, in harmony]’ (Sof. 3,9)”. …Maimonides lets Christianity and Islam, so to speak, do a “qualitative leap”: he includes the two religions within a sole providential plan that sees them as protagonists of a preparatory itinerary of humanity as a whole towards the [Judaic] Messianic event.

Maimonides’ ambivalent opinion – negatively on the theological level, but positively open in its Messianic perspective – appears to be the clearest and most straightforward affirmation of the involvement of Christianity in a providential role of a Messianic-providential type. And this opinion continues to represent a major stepping stone in the path that Christianity and Judaism make together, though along parallel and distinct planes. Maybe even the category of the “descendants of Noah,” which is admittedly rather inadequate and weak, may still be used to think of Christianity in Jewish terms and to reconcile conceptually (and not only conceptually) the two religions.(Rabbi Prof. Giuseppe Laras, Rome, 4th November 2004 at the Pontifical Gregorian University)

http://www.bc.edu/research/cjl/meta-elements/texts/center/conferences/Bea_Centre_C-J_Relations_04-05/Laras.htm

Does this sound familiar? It should, if you read the following essay entered on this blog a few months ago: http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/jpiis-522-jest-at-expense-of-noachides.html

Papal Commission Promotes Noahide Laws

March 22, 2007

EDITOR’S NOTE: Now we see where all of this dialogue with the rabbis has been leading. Here is a document produced by a joint committee of the Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of “Israel” which promotes the rabbi-fabricated “Noahide Laws” and which outrageously suggests that these laws have a Biblical basis, not only in the Old Testament, but in the New Testament as well. Out of thin air, the pretext is drawn for adoption of Talmudic “Noahide Laws” by Christians.

Also note that the meeting convened on the eleventh day of the month and also the fact that this promotion of “Noahide Law” is the product of the seventh meeting of the joint commission (there are seven Noahide Laws). This is plain Kabbalism.

More information on the “Noahide Laws” can be found here:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/03/chabad-lubavitch-rabbi-to-congress.html

Jewish-Catholic Commission Meeting Report

“Moral Relativism Poses a Serious Threat to Humanity”

ROME, MARCH 20, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Here is the text of the conclusions from the bilateral commission meeting of the Catholic and Jewish delegations dedicated to improving relations between the two religions.

* * *

The Delegation of the Holy See’s Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of Israel’s Delegation for Relations with the Catholic Church — Bilateral Commission Meeting,

Jerusalem, March 11-13, 2007; Adar 21-23, 5767

1. At the seventh meeting of the above commission, held in Jerusalem, the chairmen Cardinal Jorge Mejía and Chief Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen noted the significance of the number seven within the biblical tradition as indicating fullness and maturity. They expressed the hope that the fullness of the relationship between the Catholic and the Jewish members of this commission will be a source of blessing to both faith communities and the world at large.

Cardinal Mejía also noted the recent passing of Cardinal Johannes Willebrands former president of the Holy See’s Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and a central figure in the historic transformation in Catholic-Jewish relations. May his memory always be for us a blessing.

2. The subject of the meeting was the “Freedom of Religion and Conscience and its Limits.” The human capacity to choose is a manifestation of the divine image in which all people are created (cf. Gen 1:26-27) and is foundational for the biblical concept of human responsibility and divine justice (cf. Deut 30:19).

3. God has created the human person as a social being which, by definition, places limits on individual human freedom. Moreover freedom of choice is derived from God and therefore is not absolute, but must reflect divine will and law. Accordingly human beings are called to freely obey the divine will as manifested in Creation and in his revealed word.

Jewish tradition emphasizes the Noachide Covenant (cf. Gen 9:9-12) as containing the universal moral code which is incumbent on all humanity. This idea is reflected in Christian scripture in the book of Acts 15:28-29.

4. Accordingly the idea of moral relativism is antithetical to this religious worldview and poses a serious threat to humanity. Even though the Enlightenment helped bring about a purification from the abuse of religion, secular society still requires religious foundations to sustain lasting moral values. Critical among these is the principal of the sanctity of human life and dignity. Ethical monotheism affirms these as inviolable human rights and therefore can provide inspiration in this regard for society at large.

5. While on principle the state should not at all limit freedom of religion for individuals and communities nor of moral conscience, it has the responsibility to guarantee the wellbeing and security of society. Accordingly it is obliged to intervene wherever and whenever a threat is posed by the promotion, teaching or exercise of violence and specifically terrorism and psychological manipulation in the name of religion.

6. In addition to respecting the freedom of religious choices, the integrity of faith communities should also be guaranteed. Accordingly it is legitimate for a society with a predominant religious identity to preserve its character, as long as this does not limit the freedom of minority communities and individuals to profess their alternative religious commitments, nor to limit their full civil rights and status as citizens, individuals and communities. This obliges us all to safeguard the integrity and dignity of holy sites, places of worship and cemeteries of all religious communities.

7. In the course of history, religious communities have not always been faithful to these values. Therefore there is a special obligation upon religious leaders and communities to prevent the improper use of religion and to educate towards respect for diversity which is essential in order to ensure a healthy, stable and peaceful society.

In this regard, there is a special role for families, schools and the authorities of state and society as well as the media to impart these values to future generations.

In conclusion the bilateral commission having met in the Holy City of Jerusalem, expressed the prayer that the Almighty would bless and inspire both religious and political leaders in the region and beyond, to work determinedly to promote peace, dignity, security and tranquility in the Holy Land for all its peoples and for the world as a whole.

Jerusalem,
March 13, 2007 — Adar 23, 5767

Chief Rabbi Shear Yashuv Cohen
(Chairman of the Jewish Delegation)

Chief Rabbi Ratson Arussi
Chief Rabbi Yossef Azran

Chief Rabbi David Brodman
Chief Rabbi David Rosen
Mr. Oded Wiener

Jorge Cardinal Mejía
(Chairman of the Catholic Delegation)

Cardinal Georges Cottier
Archbishop Antonio Ortega Franco

Archbishop Elias Chacour
Bishop Giacinto-Boulos Marcuzzo

Monsignor Pier Francesco Fumagalli
Father Norbert J. Hofmann S.D.B.

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/chrstuni/relations-jews-docs/rc_pc_chrstuni_doc_20070313_commissione-bilaterale_en.html

[The Sanhedrin] hopes to impose Jewish law on the Jewish people and the seven “Noahide” laws — prohibitions on theft, murder, blasphemy and others, based on Jewish teaching — on Gentile nations.

http://www.beliefnet.com/story/214/story_21456_1.html

A … goal of the … Sanhedrin’s efforts in regard to the Noahide community, is to “transform the Noahide movement from a religious phenomenon – a curiosity many have not heard of – into a powerful international movement that can successfully compete with, and with G-d’s help bring about the fall of, any (other) religious movement …”

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/90646