Archive for the ‘Bernard-Henri Lévy’ Category
My corrections to the following puff piece for this charlatan are interspersed:
French intellectual tells of insider role in Libya war
Dave Clark and Herve Rouach (AFP) – Nov 9, 2011
… That [Bernard-Henri] Levy played a role [in the Zionist takeover of Libya euphemized as] Kadhafi’s overthrow has been known since the first days of the [Zionist hostilities] in March, but the extent of his involvement was revealed this week in his new book on the war and in an interview with AFP.
He describes how … he met [terrorist] leaders in Benghazi and, on the basis of the briefest of meetings, decided to introduce them to Sarkozy.
With his trademark hand-made white shirts open to the chest, constant media appearances and celebrity lifestyle, Levy — or “BHL” as he is known in Paris — is [justifiably, but not often enough] mocked as a showman rather than a serious thinker [which he clearly is not].
He [claimed] that in March he had little idea who the men behind the rebel National Transitional Council were, having only talked briefly with its [known terrorist] leader [with Zionist intelligence agency ties] Mustafa Abdel Jalil, but he nevertheless decided France must support them [because they said they would support Counterfeit Israel].
“I don’t really know who Abdel Jalil is, but I know what a massacre is. I have seen many in by life,” [claimed] Levy, a [pseudo-]intellectual activist [instigator of Zionist atrocities] …
On March 5, Levy met leaders of the fledgling NTC in the hours after they formed the body to unite revolutionary forces against [Libya] …
Levy grabbed a satellite telephone and called Sarkozy.
“My plan is to bring a delegation from the council that was just formed to Paris … Would you agree to meet, personally, with this delegation?” he asked Sarkozy. “Of course,” the president replied, according to Levy’s book.
Five days later Levy brought a delegation to the Elysee. To general astonishment, France immediately recognised the rebel regime [suggesting that they already had the word on these spooks].
French and British diplomats worked swiftly to secure a UN resolution authorising force to [steal Libya’s resources and kill Libyan civilians while claiming to] protect Libyan civilians. On March 19 [Purim, on the rabbinic calendar, the same day of the rabbinic year that the 2003 assault on Iraq was launched] a salvo of US cruise missiles marked the start of a [Zionist] bombing campaign.
But Levy’s role was not over. He made more trips to Libya, visiting rebels in the Djebel Nafusa highlands and the besieged port of Misrata, and arranging more high-wire [gunboat] diplomacy.
He introduced CNT military leader Abdel Fatah Younes to Sarkozy in midnight talks in Paris on April 13. France sent military trainers and large quantities of weapons to the front, turning the course of the [attempted takeover].
[Levy’s] role was shifting. He had become a player in the [hostilities], helping the rebels draft public statements and attending talks between Younes and Sarkozy in which strategy and weapons drops were discussed in detail …
Full uncorrected puff piece
Bernard-Henri Lévy Indicted!
By TARIQ ALI
On January 28, activists belonging to the PIR (Parti des Indigènes de la République) are organizing a trial of Bernard-Henri Lévy in the old PCF/CGT stronghold of Saint Denis. Norman Finkelstein and myself are the only non-French who are giving evidence against BHL. The trial will commence at 6.30pm at the Bourse du Travail de St-Denis. 9-11 rue Génin, Saint Denis. Metro 13 – Porte de Paris.
Note that among the counts of indictment are Bernard-Henri Lévy’s ushering of the infidel into France and then inciting conflict between them and the natives:
“Order for the indictment of Bernard-Henri Lévy before the Assize Court, and for his arrest:
We have determined that whereas investigation has established the following facts concerning the accused:
– His unrelenting promotion of imperialism and Zionism,
– His intellectual fakery, symptom of philosophical nullity amid the accumulation of capital and power,
– His leveling of false accusations and calumnies against Iran,
– His warmongering and advocacy of “humanitarian imperialism,”
– His aiding in the creation and promotion of SOS Racisme to smother autonomous immigration movements,
– His dissemination of false news likely to sow social and religious discord between Christians and Muslims.
For these reasons, we rule that there is sufficient evidence against Bernard-Henri Lévy that he committed such acts, punishable under the Criminal Code, in regard to Articles 175, 176, 181, 183 and 184. We order the indictment of Bernard-Henri Lévy, to be lodged at the Court of Assizes of the department of Seine- Saint-Denis to be tried according to law.”
Executed in Chambers, December 18, 2010.”
In a great media spectacle in 2008, Pope Benedict baptized another player of this game, Magdi Allam, who seems to be connected with that other player of the game, Michael Ledeen HERE, HERE, HERE HERE and also through his wife Valentina Colombo, HERE.
Pius XII, Bishop Williamson Media Controversies are Theatre for Peasants, No Impediment to ‘Dialogue’January 22, 2010
For all his insight, the author will not acknowledge that the rabbis bluff when they threaten to withdraw from ‘dialogue’–the vehicle by which their nefarious goals against the Church are advanced–or that the rabbis’ helpers in the establishment press have interests other than selling newspapers.
Exaggerations for Dubious Ends
Edward Pentin – NCR
Friday, January 22, 2010
After a week in which Pope Benedict XVI visited the Great Synagogue of Rome and the Vatican and the Rabbinate of Israel held their regular annual meeting, Catholic-Jewish relations are looking considerably healthy – much more so than it might appear in some of the mass media.
As mentioned in an earlier post, whatever the controversies affecting the dialogue, relations usually continue much as they did before, largely thanks – as the Holy Father noted in his synagogue address – to advances in dialogue emanating from the Second Vatican Council’s declaration Nostra Aetate.
Rabbi David Rosen, director of the American Jewish Committee’s Department for Interreligious Affairs, called the Pope’s visit to Rome’s synagogue “a genuine milestone, putting many fears and suspicions to rest and reinvigorating the historic transformation of this relationship in our times.” He noted what he called a warm, impressive and festive atmosphere which he said was a “public expression of already well established friendships between Catholic and Jewish leadership present.”
Of course, the well trodden controversies over Pius XII, Richard Williamson and the Good Friday prayer of the Traditional Latin Mass have, rightly or wrongly, been of real concern to many Jews. Yet their real impact on dialogue is actually minor. During this week’s bilateral commission between the Vatican and Rabbinate of Israel – a meeting that included a number of very senior Judaic and Church leaders – the dispute over Pius was never raised. More important were the areas the two faiths hold in common.
“These controversies are important for the mass media, but not for our dialogue,” said Father Norbert Hoffman, the Secretary of the Vatican Commission on Religious Relations with Judaism. ”We didn’t talk about the Pius matter at all during this [commission] meeting. Of course this issue exists but it doesn’t exist in the sense that the media think it would be on the table.” He added the final assessment of the delegation of the Chief Rabbinate was that the Pope’s visit to the synagogue was “very successful.”
Earlier this week, the [Judaic advocate of dungeon sentences for non-believers of “Holocaust” dogmas who is located in France], Bernard-Henri Lévy, denounced what he said were media caricatures of Benedict XVI and Pius XII in their dealings with Jews, saying their words and deeds belied their media portrayals.
All of which further points to what many have long suspected: that certain individuals and groups, not only within the mass media but elsewhere, are sadly exaggerating and exploiting Catholic-Jewish differences to suit their own ends, whether it be to sell newspapers or, more seriously, for a variety of nefarious goals directed against the Church.