Archive for the ‘Alchemy’ Category

November 5&6 2009 Terror Talisman

November 6, 2009

These numbers and symbols have no power. The Gospel has power, but it has been forsaken.

A 40-year-old man who was reportedly fired two years ago from an engineering firm apparently returned to that office Friday and shot six people, killing one, according to police and his former employer … Swat teams and ambulances descended on the 16-story [Orlando, Florida] Gateway Center office building after receiving reports of shots having been fired at 11 a.m. Friday morning … (1 dead in shooting at Orlando office building; suspect in custody Washington Post, Friday, November 6, 2009)

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/06/AR2009110602294.html

First Things Speaks to the Kashrut-Katholic Golem

June 5, 2008

Wolf in priest’s clothing, Richard John Neuhaus is founder of the Kosher-Katholic rag, First Things whose stated purpose is “to advance a religiously informed public philosophy for the ordering of society.” While Neuhaus’ mission statement doesn’t say which religion the philosophy he is attempting to reorder society around derives from, that’s not difficult to ascertain–it’s rabbinic Judaism. We know this because Neuhaus has peddled hair-splitting pilpul intended to confuse rabbinic “premptive” destruction halacha with Catholic just war doctrine. “Preemptive” destruction is perfectly Catholic as long as you call it “defense” rather than “preemptive war” according to John Neuhaus. I am reminded of how the rabbis called the indiscriminate destruction of the defenseless nation of Lebanon by the Israeli military an act of “defense” and how this applies to the Palestinian territories on a day to day basis.

Thanks to Richard John Neuhaus we now live in a United States that has been reordered around rabbinic “preemptive” destruction ideology among many other rabbinic absurdities in absolute opposition to Christian principles. Neuhaus did not bring about this transformation alone, of course. Podhorwitz, Krystol, Krauthammer and others played key roles, but what makes Neuhaus, his pal Skull and Bones Bill Buckley and Michael Novak so pernicious is that they neutralized what should have been the major opposition group to the rabbinic “preemptive war” zeitgeist–Catholics–and they accomplished this even while the Judaized Vatican mouthed opposition to a war on Iraq. But far beyond simply neutralizing Catholics during the run up to the destruction of Iraq, Neuhaus and friends seem to have transformed Catholics into a golem which does the will of the rabbis in nearly all matters without even being payed for it like Neuhaus is.

This is a remarkable feat of human alchemy. Neuhaus must have been a sorcerer’s apprentice under his old friend, Vatican II change-agent Rabbi Abraham Heschel, a Kabbalist who was invited to participate in the writing of the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate who at that very time confided to his fellow “Jews” regarding Christians, “I want to attack their souls.”

see:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/12/vatican-ii-kabbalist-sage-rabbi-abraham.html

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/kabbalist-vatican-ii-civil-rights.html

Behold the latest First Things tripe offered for the intellectual edification of the Kashrut-Katholic Golem:

Zionism for Christians

by David Shushon

Copyright (c) 2008 First Things (June/July 2008).

Israel always matters. Biblical scholars have devoted endless pages to ancient Israel as a religious idea, and pundits have penned endless newspaper columns about modern Israel as a geopolitical entity. The deeper implications, however, have received less attention than they deserve in recent years, overshadowed by the exigencies of Middle Eastern politics. Indeed, real questions remain: What does the sheer ­existence of the modern state of Israel mean for theology—particularly for Christian theology? And what does that theology mean for the continuing existence of Israel?

“Hardly anybody will dispute that the foundation of this state had something to do with the biblical prophecy,” Christoph Cardinal Schönborn said in 1996, “even if that something is hard to define.” At ­present, the major Christian denominations are kindly disposed toward Judaism, and many Christians—­especially American evangelicals—strongly support the State of Israel …

Full article:

http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6227

First Things Speaks to the Kashrut-Katholic Golem

June 5, 2008

Wolf in priest’s clothing, Richard John Neuhaus is founder of the Kosher-Katholic rag, First Things whose stated purpose is “to advance a religiously informed public philosophy for the ordering of society.” While Neuhaus’ mission statement doesn’t say which religion the philosophy he is attempting to reorder society around derives from, it is not difficult to ascertain–it’s rabbinic Judaism. We know this because Neuhaus has peddled hair-splitting pilpul intended to confuse rabbinic “premptive” destruction halacha with Catholic just war doctrine. “Preemptive” destruction is perfectly Catholic as long as you call it “defense” rather than “preemptive war” according to John Neuhaus. I am reminded of how the rabbis called the indiscriminate destruction of the defenseless nation of Lebanon by the Israeli military an act of “defense” and how this applies to the Palestinian territories on a day to day basis.

Thanks to Richard John Neuhaus we now live in a United States that has been reordered around rabbinic “preemptive” destruction ideology among many other rabbinic absurdities in absolute opposition to Christian principles. Neuhaus did not bring about this transformation alone, of course. Podhorwitz, Krystol, Krauthammer and others played key roles, but what makes Neuhaus, his pal Skull and Bones Bill Buckley and Michael Novak so pernicious is that they neutralized what should have been the major opposition group to the rabbinic “preemptive war” zeitgeist–Catholics–and they accomplished this even while the Judaized Vatican mouthed opposition to a war on Iraq. But far beyond simply neutralizing Catholics during the run up to the destruction of Iraq, Neuhaus and friends seem to have transformed Catholics into a golem which does the will of the rabbis in nearly all matters without even being payed for it like Neuhaus is.

This is a remarkable feat of human alchemy. Neuhaus must have been a sorcerer’s apprentice under his old friend, Vatican II change-agent Rabbi Abraham Heschel, a Kabbalist who was invited to participate in the writing of the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate who at that very time confided to his fellow “Jews” regarding Christians, “I want to attack their souls.”

see:

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/12/vatican-ii-kabbalist-sage-rabbi-abraham.html

http://mauricepinay.blogspot.com/2007/02/kabbalist-vatican-ii-civil-rights.html

Behold the latest First Things tripe offered for the intellectual edification of the Kashrut-Katholic Golem:

Zionism for Christians

by David Shushon

Copyright (c) 2008 First Things (June/July 2008).

Israel always matters. Biblical scholars have devoted endless pages to ancient Israel as a religious idea, and pundits have penned endless newspaper columns about modern Israel as a geopolitical entity. The deeper implications, however, have received less attention than they deserve in recent years, overshadowed by the exigencies of Middle Eastern politics. Indeed, real questions remain: What does the sheer ­existence of the modern state of Israel mean for theology—particularly for Christian theology? And what does that theology mean for the continuing existence of Israel?

“Hardly anybody will dispute that the foundation of this state had something to do with the biblical prophecy,” Christoph Cardinal Schönborn said in 1996, “even if that something is hard to define.” At ­present, the major Christian denominations are kindly disposed toward Judaism, and many Christians—­especially American evangelicals—strongly support the State of Israel …

Full article:

http://www.firstthings.com/article.php3?id_article=6227

Papal Rabbi-Knight David Rosen Wants to Change What Christians Believe About the Pharisees

October 13, 2007

Rabbi Rosen Presents his Gospel mocking book to Benedict XVI

Christ called the pharisees “children of hell.” But what did He know … Note that this man, Rabbi David Rosen who happily identifies himself as a pharisee, also has had the title “papal knight” bestowed upon him by Benedict XVI. And note that Rabbi David Rosen is one of the signers of the document produced by the joint committee of the Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of “Israel” which claims a biblical basis for the talmudic “Noahide Laws” documented HERE.

… [Rabbi David] Rosen kept talking about Pharisees in a complimentary way. Kendall finally said, “Rabbi Rosen, I almost get the impression that you’re a Pharisee and proud of it.” Rosen replied, “You’re exactly right!” That led to more conversations, and a book …

Rosen: My hope would be that Christians would associate Pharisee with a good Jew, one who lives in the sense of the divine presence and seeks to fulfill the divine Word and will in his or her daily life. But I think we’ve got too many centuries of negative indoctrination.

So what Rosen is saying is that he wants Christians to believe exactly the opposite of what the Gospel teaches about the pharisees. Rosen goes on to call Jesus a pharisee and then creates a false dilemma between “good” pharisees who uphold the pharisaic tradition and “bad” pharisees who fall short of what he fancies to be the lofty ideals of the pharisaic tradition:

… I believe that Jesus was a Pharisee who knew that there were wonderful Pharisees around, probably the majority, but there were some who were actually desecrating the name, the message, and the tradition they were meant to be the custodians of.

One wonders where this “majority” of “good pharisees” was during Christ’s apprehension by, and trial before the Sanhedrin and subsequent execution. And one wonders further where that “majority” of “good pharisees” was when the pharisees wrote in their Talmud that Christ deserved to be executed.

And dear Rabbi Rosen, … excuse me, dear Pharisee Rosen, I seem to recall that it was precisely the pharisaic tradition itself that Christ condemned so repeatedly and so harshly; the tradition which He said makes void the Word of God which the Pharisees should have been the custodians of but were not; the tradition that you uphold and which you disingenuously attempt to makeover. You may as well attempt to sell me on the notion that the sky is red, or that 2+2=3, or that rabbis are honest men of good will …

Full article:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/october/34.56.html

More on Papal Pharisee-Knight, David Rosen Here:

The Vatican’s Knight Defenders of the Talmud

Rabbi David Rosen: “German” Pope Aware of “Special Responsibility to Reaffirm Church’s Commitment to a More Pro-Jewish Attitude

Rabbi Rosen of AJC Reassures World “Jewry” of Vatican Compliance

AJC Welcomes Vatican Clarification

Papal Rabbi-Knight David Rosen Wants to Change What Christians Believe About the Pharisees

October 13, 2007

Rabbi Rosen Presents his Gospel mocking book to Benedict XVI

Christ called the Pharisees “children of hell.” But what did He know … Note that this man, Rabbi David Rosen who happily identifies himself as a Pharisee, also has had the title “papal knight” bestowed upon him by Benedict XVI. And note that Rabbi David Rosen is one of the signers of the document produced by the joint committee of the Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of “Israel” which claims a Biblical basis for the Talmudic “Noahide Laws” documented HERE.

… [Rabbi David] Rosen kept talking about Pharisees in a complimentary way. Kendall finally said, “Rabbi Rosen, I almost get the impression that you’re a Pharisee and proud of it.” Rosen replied, “You’re exactly right!” That led to more conversations, and a book …

Rosen: My hope would be that Christians would associate Pharisee with a good Jew, one who lives in the sense of the divine presence and seeks to fulfill the divine Word and will in his or her daily life. But I think we’ve got too many centuries of negative indoctrination.

So what Rosen is saying is that he wants Christians to believe exactly the opposite of what the Gospel teaches about the Pharisees. Rosen goes on to call Jesus a Pharisee and then creates a false dilemma between “good” Pharisees who uphold the Pharisaic tradition and “bad” Pharisees who fall short of what he fancies to be the lofty ideals of the Pharisaic tradition:

… I believe that Jesus was a Pharisee who knew that there were wonderful Pharisees around, probably the majority, but there were some who were actually desecrating the name, the message, and the tradition they were meant to be the custodians of.

One wonders where this “majority” of “good Pharisees” was during Christ’s apprehension by, and trial before the Sanhedrin and subsequent execution. And one wonders further where that “majority” of “good Pharisees” was when the Pharisees wrote in their Talmud that Christ deserved to be executed.

And dear Rabbi Rosen, … excuse me, dear Pharisee Rosen, I seem to recall that it was precisely the Pharisaic tradition itself that Christ condemned so repeatedly and so harshly; the tradition which He said makes void the Word of God which the Pharisees should have been the custodians of but were not; the tradition that you uphold and which you disingenuously attempt to makeover. You may as well attempt to sell me on the notion that the sky is red, or that 2+2=3, or that rabbis are honest men of good will …

Full article:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/october/34.56.html

More on Papal Pharisee-Knight, David Rosen Here:

The Vatican’s Knight Defenders of the Talmud

Rabbi David Rosen: “German” Pope Aware of “Special Responsibility to Reaffirm Church’s Commitment to a More Pro-Jewish Attitude

Rabbi Rosen of AJC Reassures World “Jewry” of Vatican Compliance

AJC Welcomes Vatican Clarification

Papal Rabbi-Knight David Rosen Wants to Change What Christians Believe About the Pharisees

October 13, 2007

Rabbi Rosen Presents his Gospel mocking book to Benedict XVI

Christ called the pharisees “children of hell.” But what did He know … Note that this man, Rabbi David Rosen who happily identifies himself as a pharisee, also has had the title “papal knight” bestowed upon him by Benedict XVI. And note that Rabbi David Rosen is one of the signers of the document produced by the joint committee of the Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of “Israel” which claims a biblical basis for the talmudic “Noahide Laws” documented HERE.

… [Rabbi David] Rosen kept talking about Pharisees in a complimentary way. Kendall finally said, “Rabbi Rosen, I almost get the impression that you’re a Pharisee and proud of it.” Rosen replied, “You’re exactly right!” That led to more conversations, and a book …

Rosen: My hope would be that Christians would associate Pharisee with a good Jew, one who lives in the sense of the divine presence and seeks to fulfill the divine Word and will in his or her daily life. But I think we’ve got too many centuries of negative indoctrination.

So what Rosen is saying is that he wants Christians to believe exactly the opposite of what the Gospel teaches about the pharisees. Rosen goes on to call Jesus a pharisee and then creates a false dilemma between “good” pharisees who uphold the pharisaic tradition and “bad” pharisees who fall short of what he fancies to be the lofty ideals of the pharisaic tradition:

… I believe that Jesus was a Pharisee who knew that there were wonderful Pharisees around, probably the majority, but there were some who were actually desecrating the name, the message, and the tradition they were meant to be the custodians of.

One wonders where this “majority” of “good pharisees” was during Christ’s apprehension by, and trial before the Sanhedrin and subsequent execution. And one wonders further where that “majority” of “good pharisees” was when the pharisees wrote in their Talmud that Christ deserved to be executed.

And dear Rabbi Rosen, … excuse me, dear Pharisee Rosen, I seem to recall that it was precisely the pharisaic tradition itself that Christ condemned so repeatedly and so harshly; the tradition which He said makes void the Word of God which the Pharisees should have been the custodians of but were not; the tradition that you uphold and which you disingenuously attempt to makeover. You may as well attempt to sell me on the notion that the sky is red, or that 2+2=3, or that rabbis are honest men of good will …

Full article:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/october/34.56.html

More on Papal Pharisee-Knight, David Rosen Here:

The Vatican’s Knight Defenders of the Talmud

Rabbi David Rosen: “German” Pope Aware of “Special Responsibility to Reaffirm Church’s Commitment to a More Pro-Jewish Attitude

Rabbi Rosen of AJC Reassures World “Jewry” of Vatican Compliance

AJC Welcomes Vatican Clarification

Papal Rabbi-Knight David Rosen Wants to Change What Christians Believe About the Pharisees

October 13, 2007

Rabbi Rosen Presents his Gospel mocking book to Benedict XVI

Christ called the pharisees “children of hell.” But what did He know … Note that this man, Rabbi David Rosen who happily identifies himself as a pharisee, also has had the title “papal knight” bestowed upon him by Benedict XVI. And note that Rabbi David Rosen is one of the signers of the document produced by the joint committee of the Papal Commission for Religious Relations with the Jews and the Chief Rabbinate of “Israel” which claims a biblical basis for the talmudic “Noahide Laws” documented HERE.

… [Rabbi David] Rosen kept talking about Pharisees in a complimentary way. Kendall finally said, “Rabbi Rosen, I almost get the impression that you’re a Pharisee and proud of it.” Rosen replied, “You’re exactly right!” That led to more conversations, and a book …

Rosen: My hope would be that Christians would associate Pharisee with a good Jew, one who lives in the sense of the divine presence and seeks to fulfill the divine Word and will in his or her daily life. But I think we’ve got too many centuries of negative indoctrination.

So what Rosen is saying is that he wants Christians to believe exactly the opposite of what the Gospel teaches about the pharisees. Rosen goes on to call Jesus a pharisee and then creates a false dilemma between “good” pharisees who uphold the pharisaic tradition and “bad” pharisees who fall short of what he fancies to be the lofty ideals of the pharisaic tradition:

… I believe that Jesus was a Pharisee who knew that there were wonderful Pharisees around, probably the majority, but there were some who were actually desecrating the name, the message, and the tradition they were meant to be the custodians of.

One wonders where this “majority” of “good pharisees” was during Christ’s apprehension by, and trial before the Sanhedrin and subsequent execution. And one wonders further where that “majority” of “good pharisees” was when the pharisees wrote in their Talmud that Christ deserved to be executed.

And dear Rabbi Rosen, … excuse me, dear Pharisee Rosen, I seem to recall that it was precisely the pharisaic tradition itself that Christ condemned so repeatedly and so harshly; the tradition which He said makes void the Word of God which the Pharisees should have been the custodians of but were not; the tradition that you uphold and which you disingenuously attempt to makeover. You may as well attempt to sell me on the notion that the sky is red, or that 2+2=3, or that rabbis are honest men of good will …

Full article:

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/october/34.56.html

More on Papal Pharisee-Knight, David Rosen Here:

The Vatican’s Knight Defenders of the Talmud

Rabbi David Rosen: “German” Pope Aware of “Special Responsibility to Reaffirm Church’s Commitment to a More Pro-Jewish Attitude

Rabbi Rosen of AJC Reassures World “Jewry” of Vatican Compliance

AJC Welcomes Vatican Clarification

Desmond Tutu PNG at University of St. Thomas, Ann Coulter Welcomed

October 5, 2007

Alchemical transmutation is readily apparent where a university named after St. Thomas Aquinas rejects Desmond Tutu who upholds just war doctrine and welcomes Ann Coulter who upholds the Talmudic law of the jungle. And the insanity is readily apparent where Judaics are encouraged in their warmongering while those who criticize them are discredited. It has become a greater crime to hurt Judaic feelings than it is to drop bombs on apartment buildings, bulldoze homes, assassinate children, and cut off basic human needs of Palestinians. “University of St. Thomas”! What a joke! Call it what it is: The University Run By Groveling Philo-Judaics.

St. Thomas won’t host Tutu

By Randy Furst, Star Tribune

October 04, 2007

A plan to invite Desmond Tutu to speak at the University of St. Thomas next year was scuttled by university officials who did not want to offend the Jewish community over the Nobel Peace Prize laureate’s views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, university officials confirmed Wednesday.

In addition, Cris Toffolo, an associate professor who supported inviting the South African archbishop and activist was removed as director of the St. Paul university’s justice and peace studies program in August.

She remains on the faculty.

Tutu’s visit will be shifted to Metropolitan State University in St. Paul, according to a local group that had planned to bring him to St. Thomas.

Doug Hennes, vice president for university and government relations at St. Thomas, said the Rev. Dennis Dease, St. Thomas’ president, made the final decision not to invite Tutu after consulting with his staff.

“He [Tutu] has been critical of Israel and Israeli policy regarding the Palestinians, so we talked with people in the Jewish community and they said they believed it would be hurtful to the Jewish community, because of things he’s said,” Hennes said …

Full article:

http://www.startribune.com/462/story/1463394.html

The ideal guest speaker (literally embodying the conjunction of opposites) for the alchemically transmuted “University of St. Thomas.”

On another topic, however, Coulter was lucid, succinct, and perfectly accurate. “I’m more of a man than any liberal,” she said.

Desmond Tutu PNG at University of St. Thomas, Ann Coulter Welcomed

October 5, 2007

Alchemical transmutation is readily apparent where a university named after St. Thomas Aquinas rejects Desmond Tutu who upholds just war doctrine and welcomes Ann Coulter who upholds the Talmudic law of the jungle. And the insanity is readily apparent where Judaics are encouraged in their warmongering while those who criticize them are discredited. It has become a greater crime to hurt Judaic feelings than it is to drop bombs on apartment buildings, bulldoze homes, assassinate children, and cut off basic human needs of Palestinians. “University of St. Thomas”! What a joke! Call it what it is: The University Run By Groveling Philo-Judaics.

St. Thomas won’t host Tutu

By Randy Furst, Star Tribune

October 04, 2007

A plan to invite Desmond Tutu to speak at the University of St. Thomas next year was scuttled by university officials who did not want to offend the Jewish community over the Nobel Peace Prize laureate’s views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, university officials confirmed Wednesday.

In addition, Cris Toffolo, an associate professor who supported inviting the South African archbishop and activist was removed as director of the St. Paul university’s justice and peace studies program in August.

She remains on the faculty.

Tutu’s visit will be shifted to Metropolitan State University in St. Paul, according to a local group that had planned to bring him to St. Thomas.

Doug Hennes, vice president for university and government relations at St. Thomas, said the Rev. Dennis Dease, St. Thomas’ president, made the final decision not to invite Tutu after consulting with his staff.

“He [Tutu] has been critical of Israel and Israeli policy regarding the Palestinians, so we talked with people in the Jewish community and they said they believed it would be hurtful to the Jewish community, because of things he’s said,” Hennes said …

Full article:

http://www.startribune.com/462/story/1463394.html

The ideal guest speaker (literally embodying the conjunction of opposites) for the alchemically transmuted “University of St. Thomas.”

On another topic, however, Coulter was lucid, succinct, and perfectly accurate. “I’m more of a man than any liberal,” she said.

Desmond Tutu PNG at University of St. Thomas, Ann Coulter Welcomed

October 5, 2007

Alchemical transmutation is readily apparent where a university named after St. Thomas Aquinas rejects Desmond Tutu who upholds just war doctrine and welcomes Ann Coulter who upholds the Talmudic law of the jungle. And the insanity is readily apparent where Judaics are encouraged in their warmongering while those who criticize them are discredited. It has become a greater crime to hurt Judaic feelings than it is to drop bombs on apartment buildings, bulldoze homes, assassinate children, and cut off basic human needs of Palestinians. “University of St. Thomas”! What a joke! Call it what it is: The University Run By Groveling Philo-Judaics.

St. Thomas won’t host Tutu

By Randy Furst, Star Tribune

October 04, 2007

A plan to invite Desmond Tutu to speak at the University of St. Thomas next year was scuttled by university officials who did not want to offend the Jewish community over the Nobel Peace Prize laureate’s views on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, university officials confirmed Wednesday.

In addition, Cris Toffolo, an associate professor who supported inviting the South African archbishop and activist was removed as director of the St. Paul university’s justice and peace studies program in August.

She remains on the faculty.

Tutu’s visit will be shifted to Metropolitan State University in St. Paul, according to a local group that had planned to bring him to St. Thomas.

Doug Hennes, vice president for university and government relations at St. Thomas, said the Rev. Dennis Dease, St. Thomas’ president, made the final decision not to invite Tutu after consulting with his staff.

“He [Tutu] has been critical of Israel and Israeli policy regarding the Palestinians, so we talked with people in the Jewish community and they said they believed it would be hurtful to the Jewish community, because of things he’s said,” Hennes said …

Full article:

http://www.startribune.com/462/story/1463394.html

The ideal guest speaker (literally embodying the conjunction of opposites) for the alchemically transmuted “University of St. Thomas.”

On another topic, however, Coulter was lucid, succinct, and perfectly accurate. “I’m more of a man than any liberal,” she said.