Archive for June, 2014
Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy.
the highest honour awarded by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, America’s premier religious liberty law firm, at the 19th anniversary Canterbury Medal Dinner at the Pierre in New York City, NY. Each year, Becket’s Canterbury Medal is given to an individual who has “most resolutely refused to render to Caesar that which is God’s.”
Rabbi Sacks’ acceptance speech where he “offered a passionate defence of religious liberty, explaining why it was not just important to American society, but to the world” can be seen HERE.
Typical of Pharisees and their religion, Orthodox Judaism, there is going to be a double standard involved, as our Lord, Jesus Christ warned us that the leaven, or doctrine of the Pharisees is hypocrisy and this case is typical in that regard.
Pharisee Sacks is a promoter of Christendom-weakening ‘religious liberty’ everywhere in the world that there is a Christian majority and a Judaic minority. The ‘religious liberty’ which Pharisee Sacks champions is the liberty for a tiny minority of antigoyite Chabad Lubavitchers to “erect” a 30′ tall menorah in front of the White House each year and ‘liberty’ for the Christian majority to be endlessly harassed by the legal system for any Christian symbolism on public property.
But in the Israeli state where there is a Judaic majority and a fast disappearing Christian minority regularly threatened, spat upon and attacked by members of the Judaic majority; where it is illegal to preach the Gospel and where immigration laws ban Christians from new citizenship, etc., etc., etc., Pharisee Sacks’ cry for religious liberty is utterly absent. His ‘religious liberty’ is a hypocritical, self-serving ruse.
And by the way, the seemingly well refined, modern Pharisee Sacks is a self-admitted devotee of the dead Messiah of racial supremacist Chabad Lubavitch Judaism, Menachem Schneerson. Sacks says that he closely followed Schneerson’s personal orders throughout his life, which of course entailed deceptively proselytizing the ‘Goyim’ to follow the ‘Noahide laws’ by appearing modern on the outside but being Chabad on the inside, as we documented HERE.
Here we see Pope Francis, like fellow liberal, progressive, enlightened, inclusive, nonjudgmental, and most of all, tolerant, ‘Holocaust’ usurer, Phil Weiss, summarily JUDGE those who ‘deny the Holocaust’ to be mentally insane and therefore fit to inhabit the furthest outer fringes, if not a solitary confinement cell or some European dungeon.
‘Nonjudgemental’ Pope Francis ‘humbly’ enables his bolshevik comrades to drive Israeli D-9 bulldozers over perennial Church doctrine and morality but where offenses against the purim spiel doctrine of Judaism are found, Francis casts unambiguous, harsh judgement.
The only authority Pope Francis has is that bestowed upon him by the Pharisees to lead the Christian flock into their jaws. Run for your temporal and spiritual lives away from him.
Did the Papacy Violate Christian Ethics on the Issue of “Holocaust Denial”?
By Paul Grubach
According to a June 13, 2014 news report, Pope Francis claimed in an interview to a Spanish newspaper that “Holocaust Denial” is “madness.” This truly is a bizarre statement on the Pope’s part, because with regard to the traditional Holocaust story, the Papacy has a documented track record of piously promoting Holocaust falsehood, while the Holocaust Revisionists have promoted the truth. Hearwith:
At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. Until 1990, a memorial plaque at Auschwitz read: “Four Million People Suffered and Died Here at the Hands of the Nazi Murderers Between the Years 1940 and 1945.” During a 1979 visit to the camp, Pope John Paul II stood before this memorial and blessed the alleged four million victims.
In July 1990, the Polish government’s Auschwitz State Museum, along with Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center, conceded that the four million figure was a gross exaggeration, and references to it were accordingly removed from the Auschwitz monument. Israeli and Polish officials then announced a tentative revised toll of about 1.1 million Auschwitz dead.
Around September of 1989, mainstream Holocaust historians began admitting that the four million figure was a deliberate myth. According to Israeli historian Yehuda Bauer, the Poles wanted to create a “national myth,” so this “required” that a large number of both Poles and Jews lost their lives at Auschwitz. Polish propagandists intentionally exaggerated the figures, and told the world that 1.5 million Poles and 2.5 million Jews were murdered at Auschwitz concentration camp. Dutch-Jewish historian Robert Jan van Pelt noted the four million falsehood was originally established by the Soviets, and then later used by the communist rulers of Poland for their own political goal of laying claim to formerly German territories.
With regard to the politically inspired falsehood that four million people were murdered at Auschwitz, the late Pope John Paul II proposed it should be used as a “religious inspiration.” We let the New York Times pick up the story here about his June of 1979 religious service at the Auschwitz concentration camp: “His voice going hoarse on the sixth day of the visit to his native Poland, the Pope asked that all his listeners commit themselves to the care of human beings and the oppressed, in testimony for the four million—including two and a half million Jews—who died in the camps he could see from the raised altar platform.”
Here we have a clear example of John Paul II lending his immense moral authority to a propaganda lie. How many millions of Christians believed the four million falsehood because the Pope himself lent his moral power to it?
If Pope John Paul II had real moral integrity on this issue, he would have publicly apologized for lending his moral authority to a falsehood and misleading his flock. At the very least, he should have shown moral integrity by publicly admitting that the Auschwitz death toll of four million is a gross exaggeration. But he never did this. Nor has any official of the Catholic Church (such as Pope Francis) ever publicly apologized for the Papal wrong of lending moral credence to the propaganda lie that four million people were murdered at Auschwitz.
Let us look at this from another angle. In Exodus 20:16 it is written: “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.” Now, this false claim that the Germans murdered four million people at Auschwitz is in fact an example of various political elites (the Soviets, Polish communists, the Allies) bearing false witness against their German neighbors. Pope John Paul II never publicly apologized for helping these political elites to “bear false witness against their neighbor.” This shows that even the so-called “moral conscience” of the West had questionable moral integrity on this Holocaust issue.
It is fair to say, I believe, that this significant expose and revision concerning the number of alleged deaths at Auschwitz was the result of what was publicly revealed by Holocaust Revisionist Ernst Zundel’s defense team at his world-shaking trials in Toronto, Canada in 1985 and 1988. Ergo, regarding the “four million murdered at Auschwitz” claim, it is the “Holocaust Denier” Ernst Zundel that brought TRUTH to the people and it was the Papacy that helped to promote Holocaust falsehood. In view of this, how dare Pope Francis claim that “Holocaust Denial is madness!”
There is no commandment in the Bible that says: “You shall believe in the Holocaust ideology.” However, there are statements in the New Testament that command the Christian to search for truth. So it is written in Mark 10: 19: “You know the commandments: You shall not bear false witness.” In John 3: 21, we read: “But he who does what is true comes to the light, that it may be clearly seen that his deeds have been wrought in God.” In John 8: 31-32, it is stated: “If you continue in my word, you are truly my disciples, and you will know the truth, and the truth will make you free.” In 1 John 2: 21, this theme of finding truth is again stated: “I write to you, not because you do not know the truth, but because you know it, and know that no lie is of the truth.” Finally, to illustrate the point, let us quote Exodus 20: 16: “You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.” These statements clearly imply that followers of the Bible’s teachings will search for truth and reject lies.
Herein lies the ultimate lesson of Pope John Paul II’s promotion of the “four-million-murdered-at-Auschwitz” falsehood. A Christian does not find the truth about the alleged Holocaust by blindly accepting what the mass media and various political elites tell him to believe. For if he did, he could end up like Pope John Paul II who accepted and promoted the propaganda falsehood that four million people were murdered at Auschwitz.
In conclusion, the real Christian strives for the truth. He gives the revisionist and traditional view of the Holocaust a fair hearing, and then attempts to determine where the truth really is. The “Holocaust” is an ideological interpretation of history that is propagated worldwide by various power elites. It is to be evaluated with the same set of rational-scientific methods that historians and political scientists apply to other doctrines of this nature.
“It was a surprise I never expected … The late Mayor Ed Koch said, “I loved John Cardinal O’Connor as I did my own flesh and blood brother… [Cardinal O’Connor] revered the Jewish people for their sublime dignity as God’s chosen race … He would have considered it the greatest honor to be united with ties of blood to the race that bore our Savior Jesus Christ and His Holy Mother. I see now that my brother’s entire life was shaped by the faith of Jewish people.”
I strongly suspect that in the future, evidence will be aired showing that Cardinal O’Connor was very aware that his maternal grandfather was a rabbi and kashrut butcher and that his lifetime of bolshevik Judaizing and Zionism was was done under the guise of an Irish Catholic (also see: Malachi Martin, Bill Buckley) because the wicked ‘Goyim’ would have killed all the perfectly innocent ‘Jews’ otherwise; the bolshevik thesis of John Connelly’s ridiculous From Enemy to Brother –that Christians were so hopelessly mired in ossified traditions of “Jew hate” that it was only by the “heroic” efforts of Judaic “converts” that Catholics could be converted to the ‘truth’ of Novus Ordo subservient Judaism enabling–which was commented on HERE.
A great evil has befallen us, such as never happened under the heavens.
This statement is clearly referring to ‘The Holocaust,’ which, according to Francis, is “a great evil, such as never happened under the heavens.”
Do you believe Francis; that ‘The Holocaust’ is the greatest evil ever to have happened under the heavens? If you’re a claimant to the Christian faith and all of its theological and philosophical truths, its not possible, not even remotely.
Jesus Christ is God incarnate. Men laid hands on Him and killed Him; they killed God; Deicide; yes that term which we’re supposed to view as odious and impermissable, because of the theological and philosophical truth that it contains so succinctly in one word. There is no possible, even conceivable evil greater than killing God incarnate, Jesus Christ. The next possible evil in the hierarchy of evil is unfathomable cosmic degrees below the killing of God incarnate to any believing and theologically, philosphically understanding Christian.
Dear Christian reader, if you don’t understand this, you don’t really understand the Christian religion and could probably be led to believe most anything disguising itself as such, such as the loathsome Holocaustianity of Pope Francis which professes that an alleged Judeocide is a greater evil than the Deicide.
Spinning off from this is further debate and controversy leading observers even further from the true Jesus who definitely spoke Aramaic in common matters to common people, biblical Hebrew and Greek in scriptural matters, and certainly never Yiddish modern ‘Hebrew,’ mishnaic Hebrew, rabbinic Aramaic, neo-Aramaic or Arabic, and all that this implicates which is a great deal for those paying attention.